TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 09 May 96 15:41:41 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
     
Any rework must be recorded for input into process control program (ie. you 
can't fix a problem if you hide it's effect.)
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: J-Std-001B work cell touchup
Author:  [log in to unmask] at esdigate 
Date:    5/9/96 9:53 AM
     
     
We are reviewing converting Mil-Std-2000A and some old 454 contracts to the 
J-std-001.  Also all new contracts would require this spec.  We have a team of 
8 people from different facets within our organization looking at a matrix of 
differences as well as questions of intepretations.  
     
I would like some input on defect observation from people in industry.  If you 
work in a work cell environment with TQC checks and someone in the work cell 
catches a defect do you count that defect or do you count it when it is 
discovered in the next work cell.  An example would be at the wave solder 
machine how do people feel about the acceptability that hand touchup done 
within the wave solder cell without recording it as rework is permitted?  I 
guess we're expanding our debate outside of our 8 person team and would like 
your input.
     
Thanks, Suzanne Nachbor
[log in to unmask]
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2