TECHNET Archives

January 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:30:44 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi Jim,
You write: "Propagation of the fracture is usually through the IMC at the
lead surface."
I respectfully disagree; if you look closely, you see that the propagation of
the fracture is usually just outside the IMC at the lead surface, in the
region of the SJ where Sn has been somewhat depleted to form the Sn/Cu IMCs.
Lets not give IMCs a bum-rap where they do not deserve it. A truly
interfacial separation shows essentially only base metal on one fracture
surface and solder (rarely IMC because in most of these cases no
metallurgical bonding (wetting=formation of IMCs) has taken place) on the
other.
Re covering the lead ends with solder am in full agreement with you.

Werner Engelmaier

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2