TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gregg Klawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:44:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Does anyone have experience and/or reliability data to support the
requirements for the minimum conductor width due to hole breakout called out
in IPC-RB-276 for class 2 product?  The requirement calls for 80% of the
connection to be intact.  If we totally drill out an external land to trace
connection (0% connected?) then "reconnect" it with the plated copper will
it at all be reliable?  Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
-Gregg
_________________________________________________________
Gregg Klawson                        tel: +1.508.880.1822
GTE Government Systems Corp          fax: +1.508.880.4891
Taunton, Massachusetts USA         email:  [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2