TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:16:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (145 lines)
All;

As previously mentioned, the IPC-2221, Generic Standard on Printed Board
Design, is currently in committee, as a replacement for the current
IPC-D-275. It contains a much expanded table on copper finishes, which
includes the thinner gold and nickel requirements you have all eluded to.

Sincerely,
Gary Ferrari
Chairman - IPC-D-275


At 11:33 AM 4/24/96 -0500, George Franck  X2648  N408 wrote:
>Be sure to note that the 3-8 microinches that Tracy calls out is much less
>than the minimum 50 microinches that IPC-D-275 Table 3-8 calls out.  There
>has been a large shift in the use of Gold as a replacement for solder which
>has not been reflected in the IPC specs. (OK, OK, The IPC guys will
>probably prove me wrong, but I haven't found it in my small cache of
>Specs.)
>
>A lot of this shift is due to getting fine pitch pads flat, PWB
>solderability  shelf life issues, no clean solder process improvements, and
>to a (much) lesser degree the pursuit of an enviromentally-friendly
>"unleaded" PWB.
>
>Steve,
>When will the snows start in New South Wales?  Have a great winter!  ;-)
>
>  ====================================================================
>                           George Franck
>  PWB Product Assurance                     Phone (703) 560-5000 x2648
>  E-Systems M/S N408                              Fax   (703) 280-4613
>  7700 Arlington Blvd                  E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
>  Falls Church Va 22046                      E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
>  ====================================================================
>
>
>>You're going to need to spec a nickel underlayer (barrier and soldered to)
>>and a max gold thickness to prevent voiding and gold embrittlement of solder
>>joints.
>>
>>We spec that the nickel be an electroless nickel/immersion gold process be
>>used and that the nickel thickness is a minimum of 100 microinches followed
>>by 3 - 8 microinches of 99.9% gold.  The gold is also soft, <90 Knoop, and
>>can be wire bonded to.  This gold finish is a Type III Hardness Grade A
>>strike according to MIL-G-45204.
>>
>>The immersion gold process is electroless but self limiting, nickel is
>>displaced and replaced by gold.  As soon as the surface layer of nickel is
>>no longer exposed, the plating process comes to a halt.  Depending on who/what
>>PCB shop or chemical supplier you talk to, the resultant gold thickness is in
>>the 2 - 12 microinch range.
>>
>>Tracy Tennant
>>[log in to unmask]
>>
>> ---------- Start of forwarded message ----------
>>
>>                                                              Message#
802373
>>                                                        24-APR-1996
06:42:42.00
>>From:   [log in to unmask]
>>To:     STHUMMEL,TTENNANT,[log in to unmask]
>>Subj:   Re: Gold Flash on PWB's
>>
>>
>>Received: from micron.co by BOGEN4 Wed, 24 APR 96 06:42:13 MDT
>>Received: from is04.micron.com by micron.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
>>        id GAA01635; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:41:51 -0600
>>Received: from simon.ipc.org ([168.113.24.64]) by relay.micron.com with
>>SMTP id
>>        <185386>; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:42:11 -0600
>>Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
>>         id HAA28011; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:40:35 -0700
>>Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:40:35 -0600
>>Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
>>        id m0uC3AT-00007KC; Wed, 24 Apr 96 06:55 CDT
>>Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:01:25 -0600
>>Encoding: 38 Text
>>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Resent-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Resent-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Resent-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Re: Gold Flash on PWB's
>>Resent-Message-ID: <"LqCG41.0.HA9.mQXVn"@ipc>
>>Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
>>X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3607
>>X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
>>Precedence: list
>>Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>     STEPHEN,
>>                IPC-D-275 SECT 3.8.4.3 (SOUNDS LIKE A STAR DATE DOESN'T?),
>>     CONTAINS INFORMATION ON GOLD PLATING.  ALSO REFERENCE SECTION 3.8.4.4
>>     ON NICKEL UNDERPLATING.  TABLES 3-8 AND 3-9 WILL GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF
>>     WHAT YOU NEED FOR YOU'RE END PRODUCT.  AS TO WETHER IT'S WORTH IT, YOU
>>     MUST CONSIDER YOUR END USAGE AND THEN TALK WITH YOU'RE FAB HOUSE.
>>        REGARDS,
>>
>>     ROB BUTTERWORTH
>>     SR PWB DESIGNER
>>     ADC VIDEO SYSTEMS
>>     999 RESEARCH PARKWAY
>>     MERIDEN, CT 06450
>>     [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>______________________________ Reply Separator
>>_________________________________
>>Subject: Gold Flash on PWB's
>>Author:  [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
>>Date:    4/24/96 2:52 AM
>>
>>
>>Can anyone supply a specification to call up when requesting a Gold
>>Flash finish on a PWB and is it worth it today, with the advances
>>with the HASL finishes.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Stephen Cooper
>>Manufacturing Projects Manager
>>SCITEC LIMITED
>>Apollo Place
>>Lane Cove NSW 2066
>>Australia
>>PH  : +612 428 9500
>>Fax : +612 428 9589
>>Email : [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2