TECHNET Archives

October 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:33:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Has anyone defined any internal standards for how to approve second
sources for "generic" components by datasheet review alone, without
running exhaustive tests on every source?
I just don't see the point in running 3 weeks of environmental and
stress tests in order to qualify a $0.002 10Kohm chip resistor second
source.  I should be able to look at a datasheet and say "yes this is
OK".  But when you make OEM products you need to justify why you are
approving it with this method, and I would like to write up some sort of
standard to cover off the bases.

I'm looking for places to start.  Thoughts?

Thanks as always, and regards,
Genny.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2