TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Graphicode vs. Advanced CAM Technologies
From:
"Bastian, Tom" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jun 1996 13:12:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 

     What about a product called Unicam?


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Graphicode vs. Advanced CAM Technologies
Author:  [log in to unmask] at Internet
Date:    6/3/96 3:15 PM


>Message was resent -- Original recipients were:
To: "'IPC TechNet'" 
<[log in to unmask]>-------------------------------------------- 
-----------------------------------
We are currently using Graphicode's GC-CAM (dos) and are evaluating = 
ACT's Ecam-II (windows) product.  I am looking for opinions, preferably = 
comparative, on these two products.
     
Thanks
     

ATOM RSS1 RSS2