Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 96 14:45:56 CST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mike,
Although I have no experience with X-ray techniques for excessive
Sn/Pn migration on what sounds like a populated board, I would have to
be absolutely convinced that x-raying is allowed from an independent
source - publication, standard, etc.
Depending upon the field intensity, flooding semiconductor material
with x-rays can:
1. Knock electrons loose starting current flow and voltage potentials.
2. Introduce interstitial defects into semiconductor material.
If you are working with an unpopulated board, please ignore.
Doug
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Intermetalic
Author: [log in to unmask] at internet-mail
Date: 3/28/96 8:15 PM
Hello !!
Q: Is there any standards for maximum acceptable intermetalic thickness for
63Sn/37 Pb solder? How much is too much?
A: ???
Q: Wihout performing any destructive test, is there any way to detect
excessive Sn/Pn migration? ( X-Ray dispresion????? )
A: I have used SEM/EDS (Line Profiling) successfully to perform reliability
studies on intermetallic formation and growth on flip chip 10/90 solder.
I have also used SEM/EDS (X-Ray Mapping) to study tin phase growth and migration
for this flip chip system.
You will have to perform accelerated heat treatments on different samples for
different times then you can determine the intermetallic growth rate and the
rate of migration. You will also need high quality cross-sections of these
samples.
'''''''''''''''''
'''''''''''''''''
Nick Biunno
Zycon Corporation
[log in to unmask]
'''''''''''''''''
'''''''''''''''''
Thanksfor you response.
Mike Yuen
|
|
|