TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
FAB: Ionic test vs SIR
From:
David Arivett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Oct 1996 16:07:01 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 


  One of our customers recently asked " Is there any correlation between
Ionic contamination testing (SEC) and surface insulation resistance
testing?" It has been my understanding that the tests probably reflect many
of the same contaminants but that there may be some not detected by one or
the other test. Is this impression true? If so, what types of contamination
may not be detected?  

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2