TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 May 2013 19:18:07 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
TechNetters, In concert with colleagues, I have been conducting experiments to identify and assess the relative influence of some process factors and parameters on the performance of printed circuit boards with ENIG final finish in the J-STD-003B solder float test of S coupons.

These experiments have led me to conclude, or at least suspect, that the plated copper, on which the ENIG is deposited, has a highly significant impact on performance in the solder float test.

We have a DC copper plating line along with a Reverse Pulse copper plating line. Experimental results show significant difference in solder float testing between the lines. I had been looking at the book by Humpston and Jacobsen, Principles of Soldering, after having spent some time with the TechNet-referenced books by Manko and Klein-Wassink.

Humpston and Jacobsen's book, in the 2nd of the two chapters I read so far, appears to say plating technique can affect solderability. Maybe I'm misinterpreting something, since I'm often reading these things around 11 PM.

Anyone in the TechNet world able to help me understand if and how DC copper might solder differently from Reverse Pulse copper, after ENIG deposition?

Louis Hart
Compunetics
Monroeville, PA
USA
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
412-858-1232


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2