Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum) |
Date: | Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:03:58 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Phil,
No the Au does not tarnish, but the issue is not the Au, but the underlying
Ni it is supposed to protect. imAu is porous--you need to balance imAu
thickness between sufficient thickness for reduced porosity and too thick for
Au-embrittlement. [also, imAu is at least to some degree, self-limiting in plating
thickness].
imSn and imAg are also porous, so protecting the underlying Cu may be limited
in time also.
Vacuum sealing is a goood idea.
And no, you are NOT going to see solderability problems at 6 months or before
from Cu-Sn intermetallics with imSn—you may see it with thin HASL layers,
however. In that time-frame other problems may develop for thin layers, but IMC
is not one of them.
Werner
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|