LEADFREE Archives

April 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:03:58 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi Phil,
No the Au does not tarnish, but the issue is not the Au, but the underlying 
Ni it is supposed to protect. imAu is porous--you need to balance imAu 
thickness between sufficient thickness for reduced porosity and too thick for 
Au-embrittlement.   [also, imAu is at least to some degree, self-limiting in plating 
thickness].
imSn and imAg are also porous, so protecting the underlying Cu may be limited 
in time also.
Vacuum sealing is a goood idea.
And no, you are NOT going to see solderability problems at 6 months or before 
from Cu-Sn intermetallics with imSn—you may see it with thin HASL layers, 
however. In that time-frame other problems may develop for thin layers, but IMC 
is not one of them.
Werner

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2