LEADFREE Archives

February 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James, Chris" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:48:31 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (189 lines)
When we have raised this point with the DTi there is no mandatory

requirement to repair RoHS compliant product with RoHS compliant

materials.



However you need to consider your own scenarios and also consider the

WEEE directive, one aim of which, maybe indirect, is to keep product out

of the waste stream for as long as possible.



Say for instance you sell a compliant product which fails in the field

and your field service agent still has non compliant plug in

boards/modules, then he would be in the right to use it to repair the

product.



Regards,

Chris



-----Original Message-----

From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robin Ingenthron

Sent: 04 February 2005 21:40

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [LF] Repair of RoHS-compliant equipment



Well stated, but I am uncomfortable with the opening summary saying I

"confirmed" "that the RoHS directive does not require keeping track of

what

kind of solder was used in a connection so that it can be repaired using

the

same kind. So the decision to keep track is voluntary."  I was only

speculating why it would not be.



I certainly would welcome the answer about the research basis of

"catastrophic" "infant mortality" failures.  Perhaps repair guilds, like

the

National Electronic Service Dealers Assoc. (NESDA) should be involved

if,

say, it is a question of technique (completely remove old solder, or use

a

solder gun of XXX degree heat).  Or perhaps it's a question of certain

baby-lifting equipment needing more detailed care than repair of a LF

VCR.





Robin Ingenthron

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kostic, Andrew D." <[log in to unmask]>

To: <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 12:06 PM

Subject: Re: [LF] Repair of RoHS-compliant equipment





Well stated!



Andrew D. Kostic, Ph. D.

Engineering Fellow

Northrop Grumman

Electronic Systems

Product Integrity Engineering

(410) 765 6594







-----Original Message-----

From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Davy, Gordon

Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:57 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [LF] Repair of RoHS-compliant equipment





I thank Robin Ingenthron for his posting that confirms that the RoHS

directive does not require keeping track of what kind of solder was used

in

a connection so that it can be repaired using the same kind. So the

decision

to keep track is voluntary. David Suraski has now told us that "we have

seen

catastrophic failures resulting from the lead contamination of lead-free

solder joints."



It would be quite expensive for manufacturers/repairers to make a

mistake on

this topic. If they ignore the problem and it turns out to be real, they

risk sending infant mortality to the field. If they take the problem

seriously and it turns out to be vastly overstated, they have spent a

great

deal of money dealing with what Dieter Bergman termed in 2001 "a

logistical

nightmare." So surely the decision needs to be based on more than

anecdotes.



I strongly urge any forum subscriber with data to support what David has

claimed, that repairing a lead-free solder connection with tin-lead

solder

results in catastrophic failures (or even reduces connection

reliability),

to present the data. There's no need to reveal proprietary information.

Just

identify who did the work (so we can ask questions about it), the kinds

of

termination, the service or test environment, the number of

observations,

etc. The next best contribution would be a metallurgical analysis

explaining

why a lead-free solder connection (and I'm assuming here

tin-silver-copper

with or without antimony) might be made unreliable if repaired with

tin-lead

solder. In other words, let's bring some scientific rigor to the matter

and

get it established. There's a lot at stake here.



Gordon Davy

Baltimore, MD

[log in to unmask]

410-993-7399









------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree

To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send:

SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]

or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

---



------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree

To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send:

SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]

or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

---



------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV

1.8d

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree

To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------





-----------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential

information intended for a specific individual and purpose.  If you are not

the intended recipient, delete this message.  If you are not the intended

recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on

this message is strictly prohibited.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2