LEADFREE Archives

December 1999

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Leadfree Electronics Assembly E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 08:06:19 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (415 lines)
Ed in the below text (or here); you should be able to click on :
http://www.nemi.org ;
the web site is fairly comprehensive and self-explanatory .

Otherwise, few of us is trying to get the hold of it .
Keep you posted if possible, or somebody else could

pk

-----Original Message-----
From: edward edward szpruch [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 December 1999 6:18
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
Ch oose Alloy


Hi leadfree forum members
I am a newcomer to this forum and I am just learning what are you talking
about.
I am chief of process engineering in PCB plant.My interest in lead-free
issue is obvious:as PCB manufacturer we have to prepare ourself for a new
era.
I am just wandering: where and how I can find a short describtion of current
situation?
You are mentioning the last report of NEMI.
What it is NEMI?
I guess,that the report you are mentioning is dealing with alloys as
substitution of Pb/Sn.
What is written in?As IPC member,how can I get it?
Regards
Edward


Edward Szpruch
Eltek , Manager of Process Engineering
P.O.Box 159 ; 49101 Petah Tikva Israel
Tel  ++972 3 9395050 , Fax  ++972 3 9309581
e-mail   [log in to unmask]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Klasek [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: ? ????? 10 1999 5:51
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers
> to Ch oose Alloy
>
> Well folks, i left this note in my draft draw' for a couple of days,
> just in case I'd see it less red after sleeping on it .
> See it same now, something is not quite square ,
> so; Edwin especially : take it with a pinch of salt, still, from the few
> responses i got so far on this report/decision motto, a lot of us have a
> mixed feel on this :
>
> Yep, distressed myself.
> Checked the :
> http://www.nemi.org ; got distressed even more ;
> rather true "national" line : "have to be" NA Co. (50%) to qualify for
> membership .
> Not that it would bar us http://www.resmed.com into the cold world of
> helpless isolation , http://www.raytheon.com not listed either (to my
> pleasant surprise);
> Kirk, it looks like forking out the $25K (our)- $75K (your case I think)
> fee
> ;
> not annually I'd hope(?). Feel sad for the masses grazing on cakes , "huh"
> 's the expression indeed .
> The twist ?
> Interestingly enough , IPC being a NEMI member (and holding the proverbial
> umbrella over it's members) does therefore have the report, and does not
> disclose it (to members) ?
> Double standards, white lies, selective clubs, ipc$com ?
> We don't mind to pay for the report (of non national security
> classification) of common = all of us = interest;
> but a $10K min. shot ???
> I wonder what would happen if we'd discovered penicillin in 1999 ; we'd
> die
> by the patent laws for sure .
>
> So, Chris, what do we do here ? is this [LF]a designated "play with
> yourself" area for little boys,
> while in Edwin's mind the subject (choice) is "made" in big boys corral ?
> And/or thus, wouldn't it be jolly ethical (and wise) to pass such a
> monumental (and fundamental) conclusion (report) onto mere mortals (those
> being pillars [lets face it] of commerce)?
> Is there something (oh, what a feeling; again) to hide ; or would it wiser
> IF we'd all pull one way ?
> Even on big brother's say so.
> This subject being unpleasant as is , it's getting stickier still ('d wish
> smd polymers were like this)
> Usually the larger organizations do recognize responsibility's of
> leadership
> before getting into Microsoft likes predicaments ;
> I can even see "little" coms like Raytheon to happily follow as long they
> SEE the SENSE in it .
> What's the point of keeping the carrot under lock and key ; instead of
> spreading the gospel amongst us bunnies ?
> Very momentarily advantage of research ?
> Very myopic "decision" i'd say (in this case)
>
> Or (hope not), do we face some mexican stand-off (again, PAL, SECAM..ever
> learn?)in LF arena (Nippon & Euro obviously [despite driving it; for
> whatever reason] not in NEMI ranks)in alloy trends ?
>
> Edwin, when you say "made" ; regionally, globally, selectively (seems) ?
>
> Sorry to be disenchanted, any lights on ?
>
> Gordon ?
>
>
> Thanks ahead
>
> Paul Klasek
> ResMed
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirk D Mueller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 December 1999 14:40
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
> Ch oose Alloy
>
>
>      Uh-huh.  Well if you can't give us a copy of the report, I suspect
> we'll
> just end up duplicating the study effort.  Hopefully we'll agree on the
> new
> alloy(s) chosen.
>
> Kirk Mueller
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bradley Edwin-EEB002 <[log in to unmask]> on 12/05/99
> 08:36:26
> AM
>
> Please respond to "Leadfree Electronics Assembly E-Mail Forum."
>       <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to Bradley Edwin-EEB002
>       <[log in to unmask]>
>
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> cc:    (bcc: Kirk D Mueller/RWS/Raytheon/US)
> Subject:  Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
> Ch
>       oose              Alloy
>
>
>
>
> Paul/Kirk,
> It was a result of a thorough review of industry data from both the U.S.
> and
> Europe that
> our alloy committee compiled and analyzed followed by approval of our
> member
> OEM and EMS companies.  While much of the data is readily available, some
> of
> the data was provided by member companies. The overall data base is only
> available to NEMI member companies. If you are
> interested in membership, see the NEMI web site for more information
> (www.nemi.org) or call Ron Gedney at 703-834-2084.
>
> My main point is that there is a very short list of similar alloys out
> there
> that the component suppliers should be working on based on the voice of
> many
> of their customers.  To suggest the component suppliers should wait until
> April 2000 is a poor recommendation for those want to be proactive in the
> Pb-free arena.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Klasek [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 7:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
> Ch oose Alloy
>
>
> Curious as well Edwin,
> With NiAu board and 3.9Ag in alloy (and component metalisation) I wonder
> how
> the IMT's will stand in cycling.
> >From what I've seen before it would be too strong not to be brittle,
> with large (1206) ceramics on FR-4 CTE ?
> Hope you'd tell me (quantifiably)'m mistaken .
> Something is validated somewhere, the (why?)step from 3.9 reflow to 3.5
> wave
> is intriguing
>
> thanks ahead
>
> Paul Klasek
> ResMed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirk D Mueller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Saturday, 4 December 1999 10:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
> Ch oose Alloy
>
>
>      Can I have a copy of the report describing the reasons why those
> alloys
> were chosen?
>
> Thanks,
> Kirk Mueller
> Raytheon Systems Co.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bradley Edwin-EEB002 <[log in to unmask]> on 12/03/99
> 02:24:57
> PM
>
> Please respond to "Leadfree Electronics Assembly E-Mail Forum."
>       <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to Bradley Edwin-EEB002
>       <[log in to unmask]>
>
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> cc:    (bcc: Kirk D Mueller/RWS/Raytheon/US)
> Subject:  Re: [LF] IPC News Release: Assembly Industry Asks Suppliers to
> Ch
>       oose              Alloy
>
>
>
>
> In my mind the choices have been made.  The NEMI Pb-free Project has
> chosen
> to move forward with Sn-3.9Ag-0.6Cu for our evaluations of reflow
> appliations and Sn-0.7Cu
> and Sn-3.5Ag for wave applications.  European activities have also
> identified
> the Sn-Ag-Cu family as the recommended Pb-free alloy family.  Thus the
> component finishes must work with those similar alloys.  There is no need
> to
> wait until April 2000, the OEMs and EMSs have already made the choice and
> the solder suppliers can supply these alloys.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin Bradley
> Chair of the NEMI Pb free project
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################
>
> ################################################################
> Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
> ################################################################
> IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
> Electronic
> Assemblies.
> Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
> (http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
> 847-790-5365.
> ################################################################

################################################################
Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
################################################################
IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free
Electronic
Assemblies.
Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
(http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or
847-790-5365.
################################################################

################################################################
Leadfree E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE Leadfree <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF Leadfree
################################################################
IPCWorks -October 25-28 featuring an International Summit on Lead-Free Electronic
Assemblies.
Please visit IPC's Center for Lead-Free Electronics Assembly
(http://www.leadfree.org ) for additional information.
For technical support contact Gayatri Sardeshpande [log in to unmask] or 847-790-5365.
################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2