LEADFREE Archives

July 2003

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:52:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (129 lines)
Hi Gebhard! The IPC-9701 document is a performance test method
specification as well as a qualification requirements document. The
specification contains detailed discussion about the need for the document
user to understand how his/her test methodology interacts with physics of
failure concepts. Tarun's question pertained more to test methodology than
a requirement. The use of a common test methodology (e.g. IPC-9701) would
be highly advantageous if a future data comparison was to be conducted. I
have successfully used the 9701 test methodologies for Pbfree solder alloy
investigations - there is still much work to be done on understanding all
of the physics of failure mechanisms but having a common testing approach
has been very useful.

Dave


                                                                                                                                       
                      "Gebhard.Neifer"                                                                                                 
                      <Gebhard.Neifer@D        To:       [log in to unmask]                                                     
                      ELPHI.COM>               cc:                                                                                     
                      Sent by: Leadfree        Subject:  Re: [LF] Accelerated Thermal Cycle Profile                                    
                      <Leadfree@listser                                                                                                
                      v.ipc.org>                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                      07/30/2003 11:01                                                                                                 
                      AM                                                                                                               
                      Please respond to                                                                                                
                      "(Leadfree                                                                                                       
                      Electronics                                                                                                      
                      Assembly Forum)";                                                                                                
                      Please respond to                                                                                                
                      "Gebhard.Neifer"                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       




Hi all,
.....
thatīs  true, but be aware, that these recommendations relate to
SnPb-solder, for pb-free alloys there simply is no standard.
A few days ago Doug Romm provided an updated list of "Semiconductor
Manufacturers Lead-Free Web links" to this forum. On this sites you can
find some ideas/suggestions, as well.

gebhard














Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]> on 30.07.2003 16:47:05

Please respond to "(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)"
       <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
       [log in to unmask]








 To:     [log in to unmask]

 cc:     (bcc: Gebhard Neifer/MEGAMOS)





GLT:
Class.:     None

Subject:    Re: [LF] Accelerated Thermal Cycle Profile





Hi Tarun! Take a look at the IPC-9701 document - it has a number of
recommendations/suggestions covering temperature dwell/ramp rates.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]








We are performing an accelerated thermal cycle test for Solder Joint
Reliability of Lead Free Alloy for a -40C to 85C automotive application.
We are using a slow thermal cycling chamber that takes a long time fall
time (60 Min) from 85C to -40C.  In order to speed up our thermal cycle,
does anyone know the minimum requirements for soak(dwell) time at
temperature extremes and rise/fall time that can give us an acceptable
reliability data.

Regards,
Tarun Gupta





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2