Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum) |
Date: | Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:49:43 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Why does this happen anyways? Is it due to the higher Sn content? In this case shouldn't SN100C be even tougher? Why did I hear then that SN100C will be OK where SAC is too agressive?
Thanks,
Ioan
-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Karl Sauter
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 4:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] FW: [TN] Dissolving copper hole wall using lead free
HASL?
Dave,
That depends upon your assembly profile and peak temperature, as well as
starting copper thickness in the plated-through hole. At temperatures
higher than 230 C a SAC alloy will dissolve copper more than 3x as fast
as eutectic tin-lead at 230 C. Especially at the knee of a plated
through hole, a pin soldered-in with SAC alloy may barely allow 1 rework
depending upon your minimum copper at the knee of the hole requirements
for finished assemblies.
Regards,
Karl Sauter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|