Here in Texas, where there is no requirement to calibrate Smog Emission
Testing equipment, you pay the 30$, and if fail, either fix the car, or
drive on down the street and pay another 30$ at each station until you
get your car to pass.
-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John R. Sieber
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 7:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] RoHS: Proof of Supplier Component Compliance
Excuse me Chris, but emission testing stations, in Maryland at least,
give
you the test results.
I saw an early prototype of the IPC Standard 1572 Declaration form. It
had
places for entry of values and units on the second page. Perhaps Fern
Abram can verify this? I'm sure we will discuss it at the NIST Workshop
Declarations Session on 10/6 because NIST is participating in the
development of the 157x series of standards.
John Sieber
NIST
At 05:23 AM 9/8/2005, you wrote:
>Have you 100% self test for every other operation or claim that vendors
>make for their products on existing D of C's - I doubt it. So why get
>paranoid now? Accepting D of C's is permissible but ought if
practicable
>be backed up by spot testing.
>
>
>
>Getting details of the composition is not a requirement of RoHS and
>would add significant burden to do so. Why push for more than is
>required - if too many people push then it will become a defacto
>requirement and then a mandatory requirement.
>
>
>
>
>
>Do you take your car home after a smog check and then take it to a lab
>to have it checked again or do you accept the smog station certificate?
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Chris
>
>____________
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of jeff
>collins
>Sent: 08 September 2005 09:55
>To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>Subject: RoHS: Proof of Supplier Component Compliance
>
>
>
>Group,
>
>
>
>I am finding several component suppliers ( many who are major mfr's )
>that will issue a COC or letter of conformity to RoHS but with no
>Evidence of compliance or even a breakdown of the weights or
percentages
>of the hazardous substances.
>
>
>
>Is anyone else having this issue? This puts us in a position where we
>either have to:
>
>
>
>* Blindly accept their COC/Letter of conformance and HOPE they really
>are compliant and do not exceed the hazardous threshold limits.
>
>
>
>* Have their components tested. ( An expensive option )
>
>* Change suppliers to one that can provide this info ( A very very
>painful and expensive option at this point )
>
>
>
>So I know this is a rhetorical question but how can they claim
>compliance for their components and not know the Mass and % of Content
>of the banned substances?
>
>
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>Jeff Collins
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------- This
>message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
>To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [log in to unmask]
>
>Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
>
>List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
>For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>Scott Douglas [log in to unmask] Mike Cantwell [log in to unmask]
>
>For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>Richard Nute: [log in to unmask] Jim Bacher: [log in to unmask]
>
>All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are
>not the intended recipient, delete this message. If you are not the
>intended recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking an
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------Leadfee
>Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
>To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send:
>SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
>Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
>847-615-7100 ext.2815
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
>y
>action based on this message is strictly prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
