IPC-600-6012 Archives

December 2011

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:09:19 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (835 bytes) , metal to edge pwb.jpg (52 kB)
wondering how others interpret the applicability of 6012c 3.3.1 (and its 
6018 equivalent) with respect to haloing, for designs that have metal to 
the edge of a pwb, as shown below?? conductor to conductor spacing is 
highly compliant, distance from the solder feature to the first halo along 
the edge is less than 4 mils.


to me 3.3.1 has a context where metal is away from the board edge by 
design, unlike the attached image.....
 
Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2