IPC-600-6012 Archives

September 2002

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Hill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:24:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Correction to my last msg.


I have seen the Max. thickness responses for Hard Gold and had this question
concerning immersion gold maximum.



"I have a customer that is concerned that any readings over 5 microinches is
an indication they will get black pad.

Does anyone have a comment about the relationship to black pad if immersion
gold is over 5 microinches?"



Sorry for any confusion.


Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 Mail Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
John Perry
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 6:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Max Allowance of Gold on Areas to Be Soldered


Colleagues,

In building the IPC-6012B we are making changes to Table 3-2 for Final
Finish Requirements - your disposition on the following is requested:

At Expo, at the request of the 4-14 Plating Subcommittee chaired by George
Milad, it was recommended that for Class 1, 2 and 3 product, the maximum
allowable thickness of gold on areas to be soldered (identified in the table
as Row GS) would be 0.45 µm [17.72 µin].


More recently it has been recommended that the Class 3 maximum allowance be
increased to a value of 0.8 µm [31.5 µin].


The con's offered against this indicate that in the usage of electrolytic
gold plating finish on solderable areas, heavier thickness may not be better
as it can lead to embrittlement of the solder joint.

The pros offered for the increase indicate that in many cases involving
military product, there are two main issues, solderability and
embrittlement.  Some task group members contend that solderability can be a
major issue since military product may not be used for 1 -2 years after
product has been manufactured, whereas many commercial products built are
potentially used right away.  The second issue of embrittlement, however,
many not be so much of an issue - some task group members have calculated
that the percentage of gold in solder, in cases of 30 µin depositions, is
less than 4% and that gold embrittlement is not really a problem.  Hence an
increase in thickness, in favor of long term solderability, is desired.

What maximum thickness value for Class 3 can this task group agree is
appropriate for IPC-6012B?

Thanks,

John Perry
IPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2