Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees) |
Date: | Tue, 25 May 2010 14:35:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Everyone,
Is there a typo on Table 3-3 in 6012 Rev C? Shouldn't it say > 2
layers not >/= 2 layers. The 2 layers buried via would be covered under
Table 3-5.
Wendi
This communication is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying hereof is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of DDi. If you have received this communication in error or are not the intended recipient, you should destroy the message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing, or using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|