Hi Everyone,

The "greater than or equal" symbol in the title to Table 3-3 of IPC-6012C is there by intent.  It is there to address the plain vanilla 2-sided printed boards.  When we split out the plating thickness tables (used to all be Table 3-2) we picked up greater than 2 layers and all the sub type constructions, but forgot to include plain double-sided boards.

John Perry
Technical Project Manager
IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries(r)
3000 Lakeside Drive # 309S
Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA 
+1 847-597-2818 (tel)
+1 847-615-7105 (fax)
+1 847-615-7100 (Main)
[log in to unmask]
www.ipc.org



-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jose A Rios
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:17 PM
To: Listserv IPC-600-6012
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] New rev C

it sure looks that way....

Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896



Wendi Boger <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: IPC-600-6012 <[log in to unmask]>
05/25/2010 02:35 PM
Please respond to
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)" <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[IPC-600-6012] New rev C






Everyone,

 

    Is there a typo on Table 3-3 in 6012 Rev C?  Shouldn't it say > 2
layers not >/= 2 layers.  The 2 layers buried via would be covered under
Table 3-5.

 

Wendi


 
This communication is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that 
any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying hereof is strictly 
prohibited without the express written consent of DDi. If you have 
received this communication in error or are not the intended recipient, 
you should destroy the message and any attachments or copies, and you are 
prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing, or using any 
information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery 
by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation. 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________