IPC-600-6012 Archives

July 2001

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Perry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees <[log in to unmask]>, John Perry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:58:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Afternoon Colleagues,

Thanks to those of you who contributed your thoughts on the concept of landless vias.  This is a brief summarization of the responses generated:

Landless holes for component mounting are a solder reliability concern in vibration and some environments.  Landless vias (blind and buried) could be considered acceptable, though etching out of the barrel from the board surface will cause endless problems on multilayer boards.

Landless vias could also be considered acceptable if there are no "external" connections such as traces - otherwise absolutely no breakout should be allowed.

A principal concern would be the preferential attack of the metallization process between the laminate and the hole wall plating, and the subsequent pockets of removal.  


My question is, are there any of us out there that have some reliability data to show landless vs. standard holes?  What are some of the consequences of etching out of the barrel from the board surface on multilayer boards?  


Best,



John Perry
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, Il 60062
1-847-790-5318 (P)
1-847-509-9798 (F)
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2