Wendi,

My final mark-up shows >2, which I agree is right. This has happened
before and sometimes it's unavoidable.

Dewey

 

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendi
Boger
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] New rev C

 

Everyone,

 

 

 

    Is there a typo on Table 3-3 in 6012 Rev C?  Shouldn't it say > 2

layers not >/= 2 layers.  The 2 layers buried via would be covered under

Table 3-5.

 

 

 

Wendi

 

 

 

This communication is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying hereof is
strictly prohibited without the express written consent of DDi. If you
have received this communication in error or are not the intended
recipient, you should destroy the message and any attachments or copies,
and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing, or
using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the
erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation. 

 

______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 

______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________