Yup, I prefer the report itself to a journalistic (and sensational?) 
interpretation of it. Journalists are right to report on its coming 
existence but they should not try to summarise 20 chaptters into a short 
article.

Brian

Joe Fjelstad wrote:
> _http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/04/01/climate.report.ap/index.html?eref=
> rss_topstories_ 
> (http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/04/01/climate.report.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories) 
>  
> An attention getting title to be sure. It will be interesting to get a look  
> at the report.  
>  
> Joe  
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
>