ENVIRONET Archives

May 2002

EnviroNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Environmental Issues <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2002 09:17:45 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Joe

QUOTE
"Taiwan is a global exporter and must comply with environmental
regulations in many regions," said Thomas Chen, manager at the
Taiwan-based Electronics Testing Center. "A single reporting standard
will be essential to the continued competitiveness of our manufacturers,
as well as any other country with a significant export market."
UNQUOTE

As the great bard said, "Aye, there's the rub.". The problem is that
makers supplying the international market must design goods to cover the
requirements of the most aggressive and severe standards in each of the
markets. Therefore, they must hypothetically use lead-free to meet
European needs, TBBPA-free to meet Swedish requirements, UL 94-V0 to
cover US insurance regulations, must be EC approved to cover EMC needs.

There should be a single international standard covering all these and
other criteria, based on sound commonsense and not the extremist views
of each of them. If such an agreement were ratified by all the players,
then the playing field would be level and based on real needs, rather
than the politicians' pipe dreams.

Best regards,

Brian


Joe Fjelstad wrote:
>
> FYI
>
> http://m1e.net/c?2035688-ehKoH9wTLj/L.%4027644-yddLW9J3Kh2r%2e

ATOM RSS1 RSS2