EMBEDDEDNET Archives

April 2006

EmbeddedNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: "Inserted" embedded components - slides for today's discussion
From:
Richard Ulrich <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
D-50 Embedded Devices Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Ulrich <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:50:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Dennis -

I was teaching as usual, so I missed your presentation.

The confusion over "inserted" and "formed" embedded passives is why I
had long advocated using the term "integrated" for what we now call
"formed" and "embedded" for "inserted".  But, too late now!

- Rick

******************************************************
Dr. Richard Ulrich
Professor
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
3202 Bell Center
Univ. of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR   72701

[log in to unmask]
(479) 575-5645
******************************************************


On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Dennis Fritz wrote:

> <EPUG Report 04 06.ppt>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2