DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

June 2004

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks,Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:42:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (145 lines)
Quoted from an article I just read in a 'Planet Analog' Newsletter...
Authored by Mike Santarini, EE Times
---------------------
SAN JOSE, Calif. " Mentor Graphics and Cadence Design Systems took the
lion's share of top honors in a PCB EDA survey, but Agilent EEsof garnered
the top spot in customer satisfaction.

The 2004 study commissioned by EE Times gathered data for three studies: an
IC EDA study, this PCB study and for the first time a study on FPGA EDA tool
usage. Separate summaries of the FPGA and EDA studies can be found on
eeDesign.

The "2004 board study" drew 628 respondents, including 436 from North
America and 192 from Europe. Fifty-five percent of respondents identified
themselves as design engineers, 27 percent as engineering management, 6
percent as general management, 4 percent as layout engineer, 1 percent as
CAD manager and 8 percent as "other."

Ninety percent of respondents said they are involved with PCB design while
the rest are involved in layout.

Respondents said they build boards for a wide variety of applications. But
the bulk of respondents create boards for: the industrial control, test and
measurement market; the consumer and automotive markets; communications
equipment makers; and for military and aerospace.

The study found that the average size of a PCB design team is four
engineers, one more than the average in last year's study.

Seventy percent of respondents said PCB projects are completed in three
months or less, 23 percent said they complete them in 4-6 months, 4 percent
complete them in seven to 11 months, while 3 percent said their PCB designs
take "one to three years or more to complete." The median of eight months to
complete a PCB design did not change year over year.

Respondents said that 30 percent of overall design time is spent on
schematic entry, 31 percent on PCB layout, 20 percent on test and
manufacturing support, 11 percent on signal integrity analysis and 8 percent
on "thermal/EMI analysis."

The study indicates on average there are three PCBs in each system design,
with on average one FPGA and one ASIC per PCB.

North American PCB designs averaged seven layers, while European PCB designs
averaged five, according to the study. Average clock speeds for designs was
125 MHz, up from an average of 93 MHz in 2003.

On average, 16 percent of the networks in a PCB design were considered
"high-speed."

Fifty percent said they plan on engaging in the same number of PCB design
starts in 2004 as they did in 2003, 20 percent said "more," 14 percent said
"much more" while 7 percent indicated there will be "less" and nine percent
"much less" than last year.

Forty-nine percent of PCB respondents indicated that their tool budgets will
be the same in 2004 as in 2003. Twenty percent said they plan to spend more
this year, and 15 percent said they plan on spending "much more" this year.
Nine percent indicated they would spend less than last year on tools and 7
percent said they would spend much less on tools than they did last year.

Sixty-three percent of respondents identified signal integrity as a "very
critical" issue in PCB design.

Among vendors, Agilent EEsof rated the highest in customer satisfaction with
79 percent of EEsof users surveyed indicating they were either "very" or
"somewhat" satisfied with EEsof tools.

Mentor ranked second with a 75 percent approval rating followed closely by
Cadence with a 71 percent satisfaction rating. The industry average was 65
percent, according to the study.

Mentor Graphics took top honors in several categories including: best
after-sales support, best documentation, most ethical company, best
integration with other vendors' tools, knowledgeable sales reps and best
training services.

Cadence finished first as: current technology leader, technology leader in
three years and clearest vision of the future, among others offers.

Meanwhile Cadence spin out OrCAD, which is now largely under the control of
a distributor, also garnered several top honors, including competitive
pricing, vendor familiarity, product association, purchase consideration and
product usage."

-----------------------------------

Now, does this data look strange to anyone? Maybe a little skewed?
Maybe it's just me... but nobody gives me 3 to 8 months to complete a
board... how about you?

Of course I don't use Mentor now or Cadence, I use Protel daily. But do you
agree that their findings are ordinary or odd?  And what about the 25
percent that did not feel they were satisfied with the tool? I wonder why?

Let's ask the same questions of our member constituents... If you can spend
a few minutes answer the following questions and see how it stacks up with
their survey... this should be fun.


1) What is your Job title?
2) Are you involved in PCB Design or some other activity - (please indicate)
3) What type of boards do you create?
4) How large is a typical design team at your company?
5) What is the duration of your typical design time?
6) What percentage of the time spent is on Schematic Development?
7) What percentage of the time spent is on PCB Design or Layout
8) What percentage of the time spent is on Manufacturing support
9) What percentage of the time spent is on Signal Integrity analysis
10) What percentage of the time spent is on Thermal/EMI
11) How many boards are typically in your projects?
12) How many FPGA's or ASIC's  are used in your projects?
13) What is the average layer count of your PCB designs
14) What is the typical clock speed or frequency your designs operate at?
15) Do you consider your designs to be 'high speed'?
16) Will you be doing much more, more, the same, less, or much less designs
next year?
17) What CAD tool(s) do you use?
18) Do you plan on spending more, same or less on CAD tools next year?
19) Are Signal Integrity tools important to the success of your board
designs?
20) Are you very satisfied, satisfied, or not satisfied with your design
tools?
21) What does your CAD tool do Right? Or Wrong? What do you like about it
and not like about it.

This should be interesting.... let us know how you stack up against the EDA
survey... similar or different?

Enjoy.

Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer , C.I.D., C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510
http://pcbwizards.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2