DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

May 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 3 May 2000 07:20:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Depends on what you mean by "good results".

We commonly use .032", but our production quantities are low enough that the
smaller probes needed don't break as often.  If you are talking high-volume
production, your assembler would probably prefer to use a larger probe that
doesn't break as often.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Mainland [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 07:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] Test point size


I'm trying to find out if anybody out there has been using test points
smaller than .040" in dia. with good results?

Thanks

Mark Mainland
PCB Designer
Cherry Electrical Products
11200 - 88th Ave.
PO Box 581913
Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158
Ph. 262.942.6659
Page. 888.819.0198
Fx. 262-942-6334

ATOM RSS1 RSS2