DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

August 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Mainland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:14:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Mark,
Our in-house assembly wants .015" spacing on pad-pad and pad -trace.

Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Holmes [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:08 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [DC] Pad to Pad Spacing for Surface mount parts.
>
> Hi all,
>
> What guidelines do you follow for the placement of surface mount parts?
> (by
> this I mean the pad to pad spacing)
> I have in front of me  IPC-SM-782A which seems particularly vague in this
> area. It recommends 0.040" side by side
> pad to pad spacing (for what appear to 0805 type parts) and 0.025" for end
> to end spacing. I regularly go much closer
> than this. I would be most interested to hear what sort of clearances
> designers out there are really using (for reflow soldering).
>
> Our placement machine is able to place parts incredibly close, and I have
> never experienced and problems with placement accuracy.
> I assume that the soldering process has the biggest influence on pad to
> pad
> clearances.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Mark.
>
> Mark Holmes PCB Designer
> Helvar Merca Ltd.
> Hawley Mill, Hawley Road,
> Dartford Kent. DA2 7SY
> Tel: 01322 222211
> Fax: 01322 282286
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> http://www.helvar.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2