DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

May 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Mainland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 3 May 2000 09:25:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
This board will be about 30k/yr.


Mark Mainland
PCB Designer
Cherry Electrical Products
11200 - 88th Ave.
PO Box 581913
Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158
Ph. 262.942.6659
Page. 888.819.0198
Fx. 262-942-6334

> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Patrick [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 9:21 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [DC] Test point size
>
> Depends on what you mean by "good results".
>
> We commonly use .032", but our production quantities are low enough that
> the
> smaller probes needed don't break as often.  If you are talking
> high-volume
> production, your assembler would probably prefer to use a larger probe
> that
> doesn't break as often.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Mainland [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 07:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [DC] Test point size
>
>
> I'm trying to find out if anybody out there has been using test points
> smaller than .040" in dia. with good results?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark Mainland
> PCB Designer
> Cherry Electrical Products
> 11200 - 88th Ave.
> PO Box 581913
> Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158
> Ph. 262.942.6659
> Page. 888.819.0198
> Fx. 262-942-6334

ATOM RSS1 RSS2