DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

July 2003

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jack C. Olson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:19:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
No, the traces are not imbedded.
The traces of interest are not on layer 1, they are on layer 4.
But that is not even important. Sorry if I was unclear.

The real question is:
What if the traces are interspersed between solid planes, and
although they are part of a +2.6V circuit, they happen to be
closer to a +5V plane.
I think they will use the +5V plane but it doesn't matter.

Does it matter? Is a plane a plane?





                      "Kowalewski,
                      Andy"
                      <AKowalewski@sych
                      ip.com>
                                        To: "'(Designers Council Forum)'" <[log in to unmask]>
                      07/14/2003 02:04      "'Jack C. Olson'" <[log in to unmask]>
                      PM                cc:



                                          Subject:      RE: [DC] Reference Planes for Impedance Controlled Signals




Caterpillar: Confidential Green                 Retain Until: 08/13/2003
                                                Retention Category:  G90 -
                                                General
                                                Matters/Administration




Need more info.

Is your trace of interest on layer 1 and the planes are in sequence below
that?

I assume you don't mean that the trace is embedded in the +2.6V or +3.3V
layers?

I'm not sure why you mention the 4th signal layer. Is that significant? Is
that where your trace of interest is?

The power and ground planes are equal reference planes if they are tightly
coupled together to AC signals. That happens if the planes are very close
together or there are lots of decoupling capacitors scattered around the
board that tightly couple them.

Of course, changing signal layers can change a microstrip configuration to
a
stripline, balanced or unbalanced, as well as change reference planes.


Andy K.
Sychip Inc
Office (972) 202 8852


-----Original Message-----
From: Jack C. Olson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] Reference Planes for Impedance Controlled Signals


Reference Planes for Impedance Controlled Signals

I might be showing my ignorance by asking this question.
I thought I knew, but now I'm being challenged on it.

If I have impedance controlled signals that are part of
a circuit that is being run on +2.6V or +3.3V, but there
is a closer plane available, like +5V, the signal returns
will snap to the closer one, right? Does it matter which
TYPE of plane is being used a reference? The text I
received from a colleague implies that if my 2.6V plane
is too far from my 4th signal layer, which is next to the
+5V plane, then they will not be impedance controlled.
Doesn't sound right to me...

Jack (the new guy)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2