Jim:

Compare the body width dimensions (W) in Figure 2 with the land pattern width 
(X) in Figure 3.  You will see that the min pad width is always larger than 
the body width until you get to a 1210.  For the 1210 and 1812 caps they have 
specified all these pad widths narrower than the component body.  Since the 
component pads are metalized all the way around, it doesn't make sense.

The next rev of IPC SM782 corrects this error.  They have also modified the 
fillet tables (Figure 4).

Following are the "new" pad widths that IPC faxed to us.  All the other 
figure 3 and 4 data changed also.

RLP no.	Size	X dim	|	Body width max (unchanged)
135A	1210	2.7     |	2.64
136A	1812	3.4     |	2.65
137A	1825	6.8	|	3.35  * (sure seems like a 6.8 pad width is 
                                         an overkill)

gary ...

****************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05      *
**************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:            *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
****************************************************************************