Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:52:12 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don,
The size of the anti-pad should not be so large that it allows slivers
of copper 5 mils or less between anti-pads. These slivers can break loose
and cause shorts. Go with 0.029 over the nominal hole size.
Have not had a board shop question vias that were not thermally isolated.
My EE's (like I own them) prefer not to thermally isolate vias.
---------------------------
John Laur
Rockwell Automation
Allen-Bradley Co Inc.
1201 South Second Street
Milwaukee, WI 53204
+1 414 382 2162 (fax)
+1 414 382 2393 (phone)
[log in to unmask]
---------------------------
> From [log in to unmask] Tue Sep 17 09:36:47 1996
> Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 09:23:51 -0700
> Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
> From: "Walker, Don" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re[2]: Design (fwd)
> Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> With thermal connections you can visually tell to which plane a via
> is connected... don't hardly seem worth it, does it.
>
> Actually, I think the biggest reason we used thermal connections on
> vias originally was because the CAD systems were so limited in the
> kind of pad stacks which could be defined, especially with regard to
> vias. Prior to CAD systems 99% of the boards designed were only 2 layer.
>
> I had been considering switching to direct connection (I'd have to convince
> the engineers that it really is OK... sometimes it like talking to children).
> What differences have you noticed? Performance should be very marginally
> better. Board shop processes should be the same. Do the board shops call
> and ask about them?
>
> In this same vein -- We have traditionaly used anti-pads which are larger
> than the positive pads on the outer layers. I have thought about switching
> to an anti-pad just large enough to clear the hole barrel + std clearance.
> Any comments/advise?
>
> [log in to unmask]
> Don Walker
>
>
> > This discussion brings up another point....
> >
> > Does it make sense to use thermal connections on vias?
> > Thermals were originally used on thru hole comps to increase
> > solderability of the leads, but now that is not necessary for SMT.
> > Is there any reason to use them for vias?
> > I've been using direct connection to the inner planes.
> >
> > Tom Kavendek
> > Lucent Technologies
> > Murray Hill, N.J.
> > [log in to unmask]
>
> ****************************************************************************
> * The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
> ****************************************************************************
> * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
> * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
> ****************************************************************************
>
>
****************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
****************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
****************************************************************************
|
|
|