DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

October 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ricketts <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:56:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
I have used soldermask "dams", where you can lay a 30 mil wide strip of
soldermask in the copper area, right where the non-thermally enhanced copper
would normally be masked. Make sure your paste layer is inside this dam.

David Ricketts

Pertek Engineering
Voice: 949-475-4485
Fax:   949-475-4493

mailto:[log in to unmask]

http://www.PertekEngineering.com

-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of David
Cary
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 5:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] using PWB as heat sink

Dear Dennis Beerman,

OK, this sounds great for through-hole components.

But my cow-orkers speculate that my surface-mount transistors (SOT223,
TO252,
DPAK, etc.) will swim out of position unless I add some green solder mask.
Not
to mention that large area will bring too much or too little (depending on
who
is spreading the FUD) solder to the drain pad.

Do surface-mount transistors need solder mask to hold them in position
during
reflow (when the PWB drain pad is much larger than the component's drain
pad) ?
(Is the surface tension on the other 2 feet of the package enough to hold it
in
position ?). Do surface mount transistors need solder mask  to bring the
"right"
amount of solder to the drain pad of the component ?

Since I'm soldering the drain pad directly to the copper on the PWB, that
will
give better thermal transfer than any kind of thermal grease or other
compound.

Thermal vias sound good, although Jeffrey G. Holmes found that arrays of
through-plated holes make no difference in still-air testing (my product has
no
cooling fan).
Jeffrey G. Holmes, "Surface Mount Technology" September 1993
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Hills/5131/thermal.htm

---- original ----
"Beerman, Dennis" <[log in to unmask]> on 2000-10-13 12:38:38 PM


My experience has been to provide a land area with no soldermask covering.
This provides a better method for the heat to dissipate into the surrounding
air.

John Morin <[log in to unmask]> on 2000-10-13 01:09:16 PM

...
Dave
     My experience here is that you need to open the soldermask in the area
where the component will contact the board. The mask, air or any other
material will hinder the transfer of heat. Furthermore you may also
consider using a thermal compound between the component and the board.
You may also want to add several small vias under the component if the
metal under the part is a part of some internal net that you can use to
help dissipate more heat.

     Hope this helps.
---- end original ----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2