DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 2009

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alexis Meehan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:59:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
One of our engineers has asked if we can implement via-in-pad on a handful of 0603 pads to facilitate routing of critical lines. We've never done it here before, and I know that it increases both fab and assembly costs. I'm also concerned about the risks involved (trapped solvents, rising via plugs, etc). Has anyone out there used this technology on only a few components with success (and minimal problems)? I'm not sure if we should be doing this on a layout spin that needs to be our production version. Thanks in advance for any feedback.

Alexis Meehan
Opnext Subsystems, Inc.
Desk: 408-385-3040

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2