DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

April 2005

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jack C. Olson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:17:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (233 lines)
Yes, you are right. I was being harsh, sorry.

I just didn't want anyone to get the wrong impression
that using thick copper was a bad idea or dangerous
or something, because we do it all the time.

I'm embarrassed that I can't find that chart, it shows
how much trace/space you need for different copper
thicknesses. If anyone has it, please post it, ok?

Jack
(the "usually organized paperless office" kinda guy)






             Billy Bharath
             <[log in to unmask]
             za>
                                                                        To
             04/06/2005 10:11                                           To
             AM                        "'Jack C. Olson'"
                                       <[log in to unmask]>
                                       "(Designers Council Forum)"
                                       <[log in to unmask]>
                                       Billy Bharath <[log in to unmask]>
                                                                        cc





                                                                   Subject
                                       RE: [DC] PCB TECHNOLOGY (2 oz
                                       copper)









Caterpillar: Confidential Green                 Retain Until: 05/06/2005
                                                Retention Category:  G90 -
                                                General
                                                Matters/Administration


I dont understand why you would say this is a misleading response, your
statement supports my experience the thicker the copper the wider the
spacing, therefore based on my spacing (5 thou) the manufacturer could not
(they probably can now) successfully produce a 16 layer using 1 ounce on a
1.6 material.
The educational trip was usefull
Billy

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack C. Olson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:57 PM
To: (Designers Council Forum); Billy Bharath
Subject: Re: [DC] PCB TECHNOLOGY (2 oz copper)







I think this is a misleading response.

The problems you describe are not from
using thick copper, it's from having too
many layers of thick copper crammed into
a specified final thickness. Of COURSE
14 layers of 2oz would be impossible,
that's over 40mils of metal in a 62mil
stackup! (counting the surface plating)
ridiculous!

Since the layer count was not specified,
the 14layer example is not necessarily
relevant, sorry to sound like a bee-otch
<grin>

We use 2oz copper on probably 95%
of our boards with no ill effects. The
primary consideration would be your
trace width and space clearances, for
thicker copper you need more room to
work. For 2oz I  wouldn't go below 6/6
without talking to your vendor, and for
more I would add another mil per ounce
I have a chart here somewhere, but I
can't seem to find it right now (I have
never gone above 2oz) If I find it I'll
post it.

Jack






             Billy Bharath
             <[log in to unmask]
             ZA>
             Sent by:                                                   To
             DesignerCouncil                                            To
             <DesignerCouncil@         [log in to unmask]
             ipc.org>                                                   cc


             04/06/2005 07:33
             AM

                                                                   Subject
             Please respond to         Re: [DC] PCB TECHNOLOGY (2 oz
                "(Designers            copper)
              Council Forum)"
             <DesignerCouncil@
             IPC.ORG>; Please
                respond to
               Billy Bharath
             <[log in to unmask]
                    ZA>





Caterpillar: Confidential Green                 Retain Until: 05/06/2005
                                                Retention Category:  G90 -
                                                General
                                                Matters/Administration


Hi,
Many years ago(+/- 6 years) we designed 14 layers into a 1.6 thick pcb
using
1 ounce copper on the internal layers, sadly the manufacturing houses
experienced "copper spreading" on the internal layers. The explanation
provided was that squeezing 14 layers into 1.6mm pcb was causing the
internal layer copper to spread sideways. We were than advised to consider
0.5 ounce(17u) copper. We changed to 0.5 ounce and NEVER had a problem
since. Using that as an argument I would than assume using 2 ounce copper
could have made that pcb almost impossible to manufacture, than again it
also depends on the number of layers.
regards
Billy Bharath

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanchez-Benavides Erika
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 2:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] PCB TECHNOLOGY (2 oz copper)


Hello all,
One of our PCB suppliers came out with a PCB design that have 2 ounces
of copper on all layers. Until now we have worked with PCB that have 2
ounces of copper only on the exterior layers, and only one ounce of
copper on the interior layers.

We do not have experience working with PCBs with 2 ounces of copper on
all the layers.
Would you mind helping us to gain more knowledge regarding these PCBs?
Are there any risks associated with this design: thermal events,
concerns, things that we should be aware of?

Thanks in advance,

..........................................................

Kind regards
Erika E. Sanchez
PCB Designer
Siemens VDO
Internet: http://www.siemensvdo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2