DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

November 2006

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks,Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:49:50 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I'm curious as to how folks can justify going to Flex circuits with the
enormous costs involved in making them... (suffering from sticker shock)

The costs going from rigid to rigid-flex seem to be about 10:1.

Is that typical?

Any comments on making the transition to flex that someone with the 'scars'
can share?

P.S. - Please call me if you have some idea of how to keep flex costs down
and make this technology a viable option in a commercial low volume product.
Otherwise I think a ribbon cable and connector are much cheaper alternatives
to building the cable into a rigid-flex board.

Best regards,


Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer, C.I.D.+
Tel: (760)597-1500 Fax: (760)597-1510
Datron World Communications, Inc.
Vista, California

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2