DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

February 2001

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Beerman, Dennis" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:43:31 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
I'd be glad to hear your version of what a spec should contain, so that the
entire industry could use it.

        ----------
        From:  Chris Robertson [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:  Monday, February 26, 2001 9:41 AM
        To:  [log in to unmask]
        Subject:  [DC] When and where?

        I don't pay much attention to where the IPC council meetings are
        held, or much anything else in that matter.
        Everything IPC, I feel that what I have to say, (along with most
        people that use IPC) is a bit moot.
        I watch this server for lively discussion on standards and such,
        but am still disgusted by the unclear verbiage of IPC specs.
        I'm ready to attack this topic.

        First, I would like to ask, where is there a council meeting
        in the southeastern region?...and when?

        Second, I would like to ask others;
        Do you feel that IPC does nothing to address fabrication
        questions in relation to what we should specify?

        Are there books diluted, as so there will be more of them....
        to sell?

        Are the books infamously unclear?

        Don't give us a table in a book, so we may copy and draw little
        lines to figure values. Neither does an online calculator help
        those with limited inet access or none at all.
        (Give me your formulas and I'll make a stand alone calculator for
        all of the tables if I need to)

        Address fabrication with better clarity and address the different
        levels of fabrication.

        It seems that the current specs are no more than a dressed up
        275 spec. I'm sure that allot is being done, but designers
        as a whole laugh about IPC specs for these reasons.

        I don't mean for this to sound like a rant, but most that I speak
        with cite these reasons for their discontent and non-conformity.
        It has to be said......

        Chris Robertson
        [log in to unmask]


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
        DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV 1.8d
        To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
        the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
        To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
        Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases > E-mail Archives
        Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
        information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2