DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

February 2007

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:13:51 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Well... I don't think that anyone noticed this before. (I only did after 
reading line by line... slooooowly.)

Anyway - we just got one company to toss it back to us - saying that they 
cannot do ENIG. (That should've been my first clue something was amiss.)

This is the only board in the 'box' that has this ENIG finish specified.

Another thing that should've been a 'red flag'.

We _will_ go back to the client and ask for clarification... they're just a 
bit slow in getting back to us, is all.

I'll tell ya this. They've had us scrambling around here the last few days...

*sigh*

Thanks for yall's input on this.

Regards,

James Jackson




Quoting mattyk <[log in to unmask]>:

> Just me, but why not go back to the client and verify? 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James
> Jackson
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:53 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [DC] Contradictory Fab Notes?
> 
> Okay folks,
> 
> We have a client that we have contracted to fabricate a PCB for.
> 
> They finally produced a Fab Drawing, and in the Notes, they have the
> following...
> 
> 3.2 Board Material to comply with IPC 4101/21,
>     FR4 Material. Copper Clad both sides, 1Oz
>     Copper, 0.062 Thk, ENIG Plating finish.
> 
> ...
> 
> 3.9 Electro Solder Plate entire copper surfaces,
>     .0003 minimum thickness and reflow solder
>     (Infrared Fusing Preferred).
> 
> ....
> 
> Now... to my way of thinking, they have specified the PCB finish twice. 
> In 3.2, they are wanting a gold finish (Electroless Nickel Immersion
> Gold).
> In 3.9, they are wanting a solder-plated finish.
> 
> 
> Or, am I mis-reading this?
> 
> (I have left out the other notes 3.1, and 3.3 - 3.8, as they do not apply
> to
> this.)
> 
> Could someone more knowledgeable set me straight?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> James Jackson
> Oztronics 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
> text
> in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
> To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
> DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL) Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org >
> On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
> information,
> or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2