DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Olson, Jack" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:14:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
This is the first time I can ever remember a manufacturer asking for input
from designers.
You should get a standing ovation....

THANK YOU!

Jack

(p.s. unfortunately, file attachments don't come thru the server, but thanks
for caring)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Mark Gilbert [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Monday, September 25, 2000 12:19 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        [DC] Pad Layout Question

My company is a manufacturer of oscillators and I have some questions
regarding appropriate pad/lead layout.  I am not a design engineer and seek
advice.  Attached is a copy of the proposed layout.  Given the small
dimensions and the spacing between solder areas, there is concern of
problems with manufacturability.  I have two questions:  1.) Does anyone see
any issues with this current layout and 2.) If the 0.600 dimension (penciled
in by hand) is shortened to any degree, would this be a problem?  Please
advise, thank you.

 <<PadLayout.bmp>>
Regards,
Mark Gilbert, Product/Process Engineer
FOX Electronics
For Frequency Control Solutions. . . Fast:
1-888-GET2FOX, ext. 289
Fax: 941-693-1554

http://www.foxonline.com/ <http://www.foxonline.com/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2