Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Sat, 8 May 1999 15:15:34 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, no one would do it by hand, too much chance of error. Our CAD software
and all CAM softwares will take them out automatically. Its not to get extra
traces in, the manufacturers say if they are not connected to traces they
can "float around" during lamination and be misregistered during drilling.
So, why have them at all if they don't do anything but cause problems?
(unless it's a reliability issue, thus, the discussion)
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Landman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 1999 6:42 AM
To: Designer Council; Jack Olson
Cc: Kevin M. Fisher
Subject: Re: [DC] Unconnected inner-layer pads
Jack,
This is news to me! We never remove unconnected pads from
inner layers. Why
bother? I suppose if density was a serious problem and you
were trying to
squeeze an extra trace between pads, it would matter but
it's a lot of work.
This means a lot of hand work in ECAM on the gerbers- yuk.
We don't do this nor
do our contract designers.
I don't know if our board vendor does this so I'm copying
this e-mail to him to
let him respond directly to you and the forum.
Bob Landman
H&L
################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|