DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

March 2001

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ray Humphrey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:42:25 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Could someone please give me a general guideline concerning the additional
cost of using blind vias on a PCB?  Perhaps there is someone out there in
the PCB fabrication business or a fellow designer that has done some
extensive research into this?  We don't have need for buried vias, yet, but
are using more CSP packages (.5 mm pitch with .3 mm pads) that require blind
micro via-in-pad in order to get the signals out of the center pads.  An
added challenge is that we are also required to have 50-ohm controlled
impedance micro-strip lines.  This makes it rather difficult to use very
small micro-vias, due to the restricted aspect ratio of ~ .7:1.  TIA, for
any information you can provide.

Ray Humphrey
Senior PCB Designer
Maxim Integrated Products

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2