DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

February 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Theodore M. Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:11:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi All,
 I need your in-the-trenches opinions on panalization dwgs. An engineer at another plant of ours, wants us to include a panalization dwg with our pcb fab dwg to "reduce cost and provide complete design integrity against a vendor incorrectly scoring or putting perforating tabs in the wrong place". I think of this as methodising a process that I don't have to, but I may be wrong. It has also been suggested that we provide dimensions for HASL instead of using a min/max note, again I have never been bit by this problem, I believe that if you have a good team relationship with your suppliers you both make money, thanks.
Ted Nathan
PCB Designer
Celwave, PHX
[log in to unmask]

################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2