DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

June 2007

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Gervasi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:00:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (210 lines)
To me, coplaner waveguide means having ground plane on both sides of a
single-ended trace (or both sides of a diff pair) as well a ground plane
below it on the adjacent layer.  

Differential impedance works out to be twice the impedance of a
single-ended trace if the differential lines are far enough apart.  As
you bring them together, the impedance goes down.  I usually put them
far enough apart that pair separation is not too critical to their
impedance.  

I use an online calculator to work out my stack up.  I create a
spreadsheet showing the dielectric thicknesses and the widths and
separations of all controlled impedance traces.  I give that to the
boardhouse as a starting point.  The boardhouse responds with their
recommended stackup and thicknesses.  They supposedly know which
thicknesses to use to hit a target impedance, and they certainly know
which laminate thicknesses are easiest for them to use.


-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
James Jackson
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 9:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] Impedance calculations

Okay Scott, 

I'll express my ignorance on this issue... I'm sure someone will chime
in 
with a more informed reply.

I am thinking that you are looking at calculating the differential
impedance -
 which looks to be 50 Ohms - between two signals. Correct?

Using one of the 'free' (but usually accurate - and in agreement with
the 
other 'free' calculators that I use) Impedance Calculators that I use 
(AppCAD), I can choose 'microstrip' for determining Impedance, however
this 
places a calculation between one trace and a Plane (usually Ground).

If I choose the 'Coplanar Waveguide' option, this will calculate the 
Differential Impedance usung two traces - side by side (which is similar
to 
what you are doing). Without a plane under the traces, I get about 66
Ohms - 
which is not too far off - and that is without a 'groundplane' as the
bottom 
layer. WITH a 'groundplane', I get an Impedance of about 1/2 that, or
about 
36 Ohms.

I think that by your using a Trace Thickness of 1.4 mils on a
flex-circuit 
with a thinkness of 2.0 mils is kinda marginal... it's been a while
since 
I've done a flex design, though.

The other poster is correct. You should probably contact the fabricator
and 
ask them for assistance on what you are trying to do. From memory, the
flex-
circuit fabrication house that I used was very helpful to me when I was 
designing my boards, and saved me from making too many mistakes in my
design.

Regards,

James Jackson
Oztronics




Quoting Scott Riley <[log in to unmask]>:

> I've got a design that needs to have 50ohm differential pair on a two
> layer
> flex design (microstrip). I need to come up with the material stack up
for
> this application. I came up with line width/space and material
thickness
> using a calculator that I purchased. 
> 
>  
> 
> Dielectric constant = 3.5
> 
> Substrate thickness = 0.002"
> 
> Cu weight 1oz (0.0014")
> 
> LW = 0.007"
> 
> Space = 0.004"
> 
> Calculated differential impedance = 56.7ohm
> 
> * This calculator also takes into account the cover film/solder mask 
> 
>  
> 
> However, I ran the same numbers through a different calculator (a
freebie)
> and there is a warning that the results are not valid unless the trace
> width
> is less than twice the dielectric thickness. The resulting impedance
with
> this tool is 39.1 ohm.
> 
>  
> 
> I get no errors or warning from the "store bought" calculator, but
before
> I
> proceed I want to be confident that the numbers I'm getting are indeed
> valid. I'm assuming that all the calculators use the same general
> formulas,
> but get significantly different results using these two.  I also asked
> another designer to try the numbers in his tool (Polar I believe), and
he
> gets completely different results.
> 
>  
> 
> Question: Is the "trace width must be less than 2x the material
thickness"
> a
> valid rule for all calculators, or is this something that might be
unique
> to
> this specific tool ?  
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Scott D. Riley
> Technical Design Service
> 607-658-9322 - Office
> 607-785-1696 - FAX
>  <http://www.techdesignservice.com> www.techdesignservice.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
-----
> DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV
> 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
> To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
> DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
[log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
-----
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
> E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2