Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jan 1999 07:18:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A few questions about testabaility (ICT and functional);
How far along in your design process does testabaility issues start?
Is anyone out there assigning properties to pins that are required for
testabaility (in symbol generation)?
If yes, How do the designers recoginize them?
Who defines critical pins? engineer, librarian, component eng., designer
Does anyone build seperate fan-out geoms for the same geom because of
testability? (per unique p/n, so you end up w/ 4 versions plcc20)
If yes, do you route on a standard grid or gridless?
Is each board routed with testabaility in mind, even if it is a minor volume
and may never reach a test bed?
Does anyone NOT ALLOW fan-outs under the component?
Thanks for your input,
Michael Kuczynski Librarian/Sr. Designer
Allied Signal 201-393-2122 (Phone)
699 Rt46E E/K4 201-393-2357 (Fax)
Teterboro NJ 07608
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|