DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

March 2000

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 07:19:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Thank you Ron and others.

Remind me what LPI is again?

I'm working BC (Before Coffee ...)

Regards, Doug


Ron D Huston wrote:
>
> Doug;
> As a fabricator, here's the scoop;   its Yes and No as to whether there's a cost difference.
>
> If your designs require the tolerances of LPI mask, then it will cost more to change colors. The reason is that the LPI process is a BATCH process.   Every pcb, regardless of design, is flooded with mask using the same setup. It is later exposed with your custom film in an exposure unit.   A color change requires an extra silkscreen tear-down and setup...Actual costs vary from shop to shop.   In our case, we build all proto's using LPI soldermask.
>
> On the other hand, if your design is tolerant of thermal mask, AND your fabricator still uses it, then a color change makes no cost difference.  In this case, every unique design requires a screen setup/tear-down so the color of ink on the screen makes no difference.  However, if you ask for a color that is not used often, then you may have to pay for the special purchase whether you use it all or not.   Red, black and blue are common enough alternative choices.
>
> As to whether a pcb shop charges for these costs or not varies.
>
> Hope this helps.   I think the different color on proto's vs production is a good idea and its often used.  Cost or not, its worth the lack of confusion of trying to read the fine print revision level in the copper circuitry.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2