DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 2008

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Josh Culpepper <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:32:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I am currently doing a 4 layer board and the stack is: (from top to
bottom) Signal, GND, Power, Signal. We are trying to decide which layout
is better. The first scenario is to leave a plane off of the signal
layers. The second is put a plane on the signal layers opposite of the
plane it references.   For example on the first signal layer I would
pour a power plane which references the GND and the opposite for the
other pair. I was under the impression that you would want more coupling
between your planes which would suggest the 2nd scenario would be more
correct. Is my thinking on this right or am I way off base on this.

 

Josh Culpepper CID+

Engineer 1

Clean Earth Technologies, LLC

13378 Lakefront Drive

Earth City, MO 63045

314-222-4640 ext. 126

 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2