LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


August 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides) (13 messages)
A Test for Jeanne (1 message)
AOI GR&R (1 message)
Articles on solder joint formation (5 messages)
bare board pre-bake parameters (9 messages)
Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No (9 messages)
Cloudy Conformal Coating (5 messages)
Copper thickness (6 messages)
CSP BGAs (13 messages)
Die attach and wire bond test kit (2 messages)
Eging grommet (4 messages)
Electroless Nickel Immersion Silver Surface Finish (2 messages)
ENEPIG on Die Aluminum Bond Pads (2 messages)
EXTERNAL: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating (1 message)
EXTERNAL: [TN] [OT] Counting parts on reels (1 message)
Fw: Heavy Copper PCB Houses (1 message)
gold removal question - to remove or not? (9 messages)
Hard vs. Soft gold (2 messages)
Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std (5 messages)
Heavy Copper (3 messages)
Heavy Copper PCB Houses (3 messages)
Intermittent single part failure (22 messages)
jumper wire attachment to top of chip component? (4 messages)
Laura Tubini's Email address (6 messages)
Leadfree process on Military and Aerospace. (2 messages)
LEDs CFLs (2 messages)
Material designation decode (1 message)
MCPCB - Soldering (3 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer (28 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question (33 messages)
NTC Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std (2 messages)
NTC: ooo test (1 message)
ooo test (1 message)
Part Number Classification System (4 messages)
Pattern Plated Cores (1 message)
PCB Best Practices Interest (3 messages)
PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold (20 messages)
PCBA shelf life (19 messages)
pin in paste (15 messages)
R: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating (1 message)
R: [TN] Copper thickness (1 message)
re TIN---an important article (15 messages)
RES: [TN] MCPCB - Soldering (1 message)
Session moderators needed for IPC APEX EXPO 2013 (1 message)
SMOBC process (11 messages)
Software to convert dxf format to gerber format (2 messages)
Steve's URL Site for photos (3 messages)
Stripping of ENIG (1 message)
Urgent need for obsolete Revision E of IPC-T-50 (1 message)
what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements? (32 messages)
Wire lubricant (3 messages)
[OT] Counting parts on reels (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

"end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:33:18 -0700

49 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:49:10 -0500

70 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:25:16 -0700

101 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:50:33 +0000

135 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:00:21 -0500

149 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:51:48 +0000

155 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:54:56 +0000

180 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:59:26 -0700

160 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:16:00 -0700

152 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:22:48 -0400

129 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:56:49 +0000

140 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:36:09 -0700

335 lines

Re: "end of solder"--a clarification (in the context of tin mining downsides)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:38:57 +0000

166 lines

New Thread

A Test for Jeanne

A Test for Jeanne

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:19:18 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

AOI GR&R

AOI GR&R

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:36:22 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Articles on solder joint formation

Articles on solder joint formation

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:27:01 +0000

22 lines

Re: Articles on solder joint formation

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:48:17 +0000

45 lines

Re: Articles on solder joint formation

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:51:52 -0500

52 lines

Re: Articles on solder joint formation

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:00:45 -0500

61 lines

Re: Articles on solder joint formation

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:27:49 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

bare board pre-bake parameters

bare board pre-bake parameters

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:39:39 -0400

53 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:00:27 -0500

69 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:13:19 +0000

112 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:55:28 -0400

95 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:09:05 +0000

132 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:33:52 -0500

143 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:53:57 -0400

106 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:22:42 -0700

117 lines

Re: bare board pre-bake parameters

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:12:48 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:54:28 -0500

53 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Dave Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:43:25 -0500

28 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:07:15 +0200

55 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Dave Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:24:55 -0500

31 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:31:36 -0600

58 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Kenneth J. Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:25:20 -0400

58 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:31:16 -0500

17 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Smith, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:27:21 +0000

70 lines

Re: Board Outline on gerber files...Yes/No

Robert Wolfe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:24:05 -0400

121 lines

New Thread

Cloudy Conformal Coating

Cloudy Conformal Coating

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0500

26 lines

Re: Cloudy Conformal Coating

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:27:02 -0500

55 lines

Re: Cloudy Conformal Coating

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:47:20 -0700

50 lines

Re: Cloudy Conformal Coating

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:52:35 -0500

72 lines

Re: Cloudy Conformal Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:20:45 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Copper thickness

Copper thickness

William Noel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:29:13 -0500

15 lines

Re: Copper thickness

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:41:41 -0500

45 lines

Re: Copper thickness

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:42:52 +0300

30 lines

Re: Copper thickness

Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:10:39 -0400

30 lines

Re: Copper thickness

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:33:02 -0500

56 lines

Re: Copper thickness

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:04:09 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

CSP BGAs

CSP BGAs

Amol Kane (Asteelflash,US) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:33:38 -0700

40 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:50:37 -0500

58 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Amol Kane (Asteelflash,US) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:04:21 -0700

83 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:06:15 +0100

84 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:34:16 -0400

95 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:53:34 -0500

103 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Bush, Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:31:46 -0400

70 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Amol Kane (Asteelflash,US) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:40:54 -0700

86 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:24:20 +0100

86 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Amol Kane (Asteelflash,US) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:40:45 -0700

118 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:22:22 +0100

145 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:54:46 +0100

169 lines

Re: CSP BGAs

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:37:00 -0400

154 lines

New Thread

Die attach and wire bond test kit

Die attach and wire bond test kit

Ahmad, Syed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:11:32 -0700

23 lines

Re: Die attach and wire bond test kit

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:34:26 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Eging grommet

Eging grommet

JF <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:47 -0400

27 lines

Re: Eging grommet

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:12:13 -0500

41 lines

Re: Eging grommet

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:23:02 -0400

51 lines

Re: Eging grommet

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:21:30 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Electroless Nickel Immersion Silver Surface Finish

Electroless Nickel Immersion Silver Surface Finish

Charming Chan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:45:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Immersion Silver Surface Finish

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:50:53 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

ENEPIG on Die Aluminum Bond Pads

ENEPIG on Die Aluminum Bond Pads

Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:41:09 +0000

37 lines

Re: ENEPIG on Die Aluminum Bond Pads

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:59:57 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating

Gervascio, Thomas L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:30:02 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: [TN] [OT] Counting parts on reels

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] [OT] Counting parts on reels

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:27:28 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Fw: Heavy Copper PCB Houses

Fw: Heavy Copper PCB Houses

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:07:25 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

gold removal question - to remove or not?

gold removal question - to remove or not?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:15:45 -0300

55 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:44:04 +0000

77 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:54:11 -0400

115 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:38:13 -0500

27 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:23:44 -0500

66 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:36:03 -0300

243 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:48:16 +0000

126 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:46:06 -0500

24 lines

Re: gold removal question - to remove or not?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:11:05 +0000

469 lines

New Thread

Hard vs. Soft gold

Hard vs. Soft gold

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:43:17 -0700

79 lines

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:00:42 +0000

70 lines

New Thread

Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Şefika Özkal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:40:58 +0300

124 lines

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:01:18 +0000

163 lines

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:11:37 -0400

145 lines

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:27:41 +0000

178 lines

Re: Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:49:18 +0000

214 lines

New Thread

Heavy Copper

Heavy Copper

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:14:50 -0700

14 lines

Re: Heavy Copper

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:51:25 +0300

27 lines

Re: Heavy Copper

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:23:57 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Heavy Copper PCB Houses

Heavy Copper PCB Houses

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:37:41 -0400

31 lines

Re: Heavy Copper PCB Houses

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:29:00 -0400

54 lines

Re: Heavy Copper PCB Houses

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:02:40 -0700

299 lines

New Thread

Intermittent single part failure

Intermittent single part failure

Kuczynski, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:24:27 -0400

111 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:36:14 -0500

146 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:41:40 -0500

172 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:12:01 -0400

150 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:04:11 +0100

176 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Bruce Tostevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:08:02 -0400

167 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:27:59 -0500

179 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:40:17 +0000

194 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:47:25 -0500

209 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:53:45 +0000

154 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:54:08 +0000

222 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:57:21 -0500

197 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:57:45 +0000

242 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:07:51 -0500

256 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:12:53 +0000

237 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:14:46 +0000

222 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:23:04 +0000

242 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:35:36 +0000

179 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:38:58 -0700

136 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Kuczynski, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:47:19 -0400

55 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:47:18 +0000

307 lines

Re: Intermittent single part failure

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:04:26 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

jumper wire attachment to top of chip component?

jumper wire attachment to top of chip component?

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:18:01 -0700

57 lines

Re: jumper wire attachment to top of chip component?

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:03:11 -0700

77 lines

Re: jumper wire attachment to top of chip component?

Eva J <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:28:00 -0400

67 lines

Re: jumper wire attachment to top of chip component?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:22:56 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

Laura Tubini's Email address

Laura Tubini's Email address

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:06:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Laura Tubini's Email address

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Aug 2012 15:13:09 -0700

48 lines

Re: Laura Tubini's Email address

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2012 00:56:03 +0200

48 lines

Re: Laura Tubini's Email address

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2012 00:58:03 +0200

50 lines

Re: Laura Tubini's Email address

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:05:21 -0400

58 lines

Re: Laura Tubini's Email address

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:25:13 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Leadfree process on Military and Aerospace.

Re: Leadfree process on Military and Aerospace.

Poh KH <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:10:40 +0800

30 lines

Re: Leadfree process on Military and Aerospace.

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:50:27 -0400

99 lines

New Thread

LEDs CFLs

LEDs CFLs

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:03:12 +0000

34 lines

Re: LEDs CFLs

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:24:17 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Material designation decode

Material designation decode

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:17:34 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

MCPCB - Soldering

MCPCB - Soldering

Juliano Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:55:19 -0300

33 lines

Re: MCPCB - Soldering

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 06:23:44 -0700

62 lines

Re: MCPCB - Soldering

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:16:32 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:37:44 -0500

359 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:47:01 -0500

255 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:04:29 -0500

353 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:58:32 +0100

428 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:10:29 -0300

424 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:33:11 -0500

452 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:39:25 +0000

444 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:56:42 +0100

472 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:11:39 +0000

486 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:34:15 +0100

507 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:00:22 -0500

516 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:45:41 +0100

438 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:16:17 -0500

508 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:16:56 +0000

441 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:34 +0100

464 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:23:38 +0100

543 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:26:51 +0000

523 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:41:25 +0000

480 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:03:46 +0000

455 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:22:13 +0000

516 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:40:27 -0500

358 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:16:38 -0500

376 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:04:50 +0000

391 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:34:51 -0500

394 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:18 +0000

411 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:01:16 -0500

372 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:19:47 +0000

415 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:14:39 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:29:49 -0500

333 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:40:47 -0500

354 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:44:12 -0500

373 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:35:42 -0700

369 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:36:37 -0700

387 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:48:14 +0000

429 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 07:51:26 -0700

438 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:12:53 -0700

466 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:24:29 -0500

420 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:05:32 +0000

451 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:02:33 +0000

483 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:20:31 -0500

337 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:27:01 +0000

217 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Kenneth J. Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:33:23 -0400

355 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:41:17 +0100

353 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:11:23 -0500

226 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:38:55 -0500

369 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

jrusseau.precisionanalysts.com <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:11:48 -0400

358 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:51:05 -0500

348 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:17:55 -0500

20 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:19:50 -0500

365 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:31:26 -0400

341 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:31:37 +0300

395 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:31:39 -0500

413 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:12:49 -0500

354 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:16:55 -0500

36 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:23:56 +0100

405 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Sue Knight <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:28 +0100

394 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Arbour, Michel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:13:18 -0400

375 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Sue Knight <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:17:22 +0100

426 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:28:18 +0000

443 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:56:05 -0500

55 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:59:42 -0700

393 lines

New Thread

NTC Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Re: NTC Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:15:29 +0100

198 lines

Re: NTC Hard vs. Soft gold - mil std

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:51:48 +0000

220 lines

New Thread

NTC: ooo test

NTC: ooo test

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:15:01 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

ooo test

Re: ooo test

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:16:49 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Part Number Classification System

Part Number Classification System

Bert Steck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:50:24 -0400

34 lines

Re: Part Number Classification System

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:22:18 -0400

52 lines

Re: Part Number Classification System

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:33:39 -0400

77 lines

Re: Part Number Classification System

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:05:13 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Pattern Plated Cores

Pattern Plated Cores

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:37:55 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

PCB Best Practices Interest

PCB Best Practices Interest

McGrath, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:51:04 -0400

33 lines

Re: PCB Best Practices Interest

Şefika Özkal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:52:11 +0300

65 lines

Re: PCB Best Practices Interest

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 21:16:53 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:12:21 -0400

34 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:20:13 +0000

66 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:48:23 -0400

68 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:10:46 -0700

55 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:14:43 +0000

54 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:32:01 -0400

54 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:42:48 +0000

90 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:30:27 -0700

70 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:40:07 +0000

114 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:46:13 -0500

117 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:28 -0500

73 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Şefika Özkal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:46:09 +0300

82 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:56:05 -0400

152 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:00:41 -0400

79 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:07:31 +0000

113 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:08:30 -0400

98 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:35:09 +0000

236 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Jana Carraway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:39:48 -0700

31 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:49:41 +0530

263 lines

Re: PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:51:31 +0000

275 lines

New Thread

PCBA shelf life

PCBA shelf life

Ivan Feng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 01:21:39 +0000

21 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:06:47 +0000

51 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:46:40 +0300

63 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:35:53 +0000

86 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Ivan Feng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:19:53 +0000

51 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:29:06 +0000

78 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:55:04 +0300

128 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:55:49 +0100

79 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:08:30 +0000

123 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:25:13 +0300

117 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:31:06 +0300

44 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:02:33 +0100

53 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Jim Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:10:49 -0400

125 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:31:04 +0000

147 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:40:44 +0000

75 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:16 -0400

174 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:26:57 -0700

178 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:07:33 +0000

188 lines

Re: PCBA shelf life

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:19:49 +0100

154 lines

New Thread

pin in paste

pin in paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:04:13 +0000

40 lines

Re: pin in paste

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:15:49 -0500

61 lines

Re: pin in paste

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:21:43 -0700

99 lines

Re: pin in paste

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:18:26 -0500

138 lines

Re: pin in paste

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:22:52 -0700

107 lines

Re: pin in paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:25:36 +0000

163 lines

Re: pin in paste

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:24:20 +0100

85 lines

Re: pin in paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:24:14 +0000

121 lines

Re: pin in paste

Gervascio, Thomas L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:18:42 +0000

90 lines

Re: pin in paste

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:13:43 -0500

19 lines

Re: pin in paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:20:28 +0000

51 lines

Re: pin in paste

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:34:47 -0500

88 lines

Re: pin in paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:56:24 +0000

117 lines

Re: pin in paste

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 21:10:17 +0100

105 lines

Re: pin in paste

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:26:17 +0000

127 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating

R: [TN] Cloudy Conformal Coating

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:34:03 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] Copper thickness

R: [TN] Copper thickness

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:57:11 +0200

111 lines

New Thread

re TIN---an important article

re TIN---an important article

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:32:10 -0700

18 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:31:53 +0300

71 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:30:39 +0100

87 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:45:11 +0000

40 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:07:54 +0300

63 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:13:13 +0100

92 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:14:36 +0000

131 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:20:12 -0700

111 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:38:46 +0000

122 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:43:42 -0500

115 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:26:36 -0300

115 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:38:05 +0100

160 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:43:02 -0500

16 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:40 +0000

145 lines

Re: re TIN---an important article

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:14:38 -0500

152 lines

New Thread

RES: [TN] MCPCB - Soldering

RES: [TN] MCPCB - Soldering

Juliano Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:22:29 -0300

69 lines

New Thread

Session moderators needed for IPC APEX EXPO 2013

Session moderators needed for IPC APEX EXPO 2013

Gayle Pervos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:05:56 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

SMOBC process

SMOBC process

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:57:44 -0400

37 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Matthew Park <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:55:43 -0400

53 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:41:55 -0700

82 lines

Re: SMOBC process

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:50:49 -0700

67 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:29:39 -0500

117 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:43:01 -0500

87 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:53:57 -0500

118 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:03:01 -0500

139 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:10:49 -0500

157 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:26:40 -0500

146 lines

Re: SMOBC process

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:07:08 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

Software to convert dxf format to gerber format

Re: Software to convert dxf format to gerber format

Poh KH <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:04:41 +0800

26 lines

Re: Software to convert dxf format to gerber format

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:26:48 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

Steve's URL Site for photos

Steve's URL Site for photos

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:21:49 -0500

23 lines

Re: Steve's URL Site for photos

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:27:46 -0500

38 lines

Re: Steve's URL Site for photos

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:32:41 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

Stripping of ENIG

Stripping of ENIG

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:33:03 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Urgent need for obsolete Revision E of IPC-T-50

Urgent need for obsolete Revision E of IPC-T-50

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:15:32 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:29:27 -0400

28 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:34:05 +0000

60 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:47:48 -0400

56 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:50:57 +0000

49 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:26:15 -0400

85 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:46:06 -0400

106 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:30:20 -0400

149 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:42:13 +0300

60 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 04:26:10 -0400

117 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:18:26 +0100

162 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:24:06 -0300

97 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:36:59 +0100

122 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:47:18 +0000

49 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:06:12 -0400

148 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:19:36 +0300

177 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[ARES CORP] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0500

141 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:58:52 -0500

156 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:03:09 -0500

170 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:07:19 +0000

207 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:09:31 -0400

101 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:19:13 -0500

175 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:22:34 -0500

223 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:26:39 -0500

155 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:51:40 +0000

210 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:54:44 +0300

182 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:59:20 -0500

178 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:09:42 +0000

232 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:09:59 -0400

181 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:19:32 -0300

243 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Olav Folland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:03:02 -0700

183 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:48:52 -0400

174 lines

Re: what is the reliability of CFLs and LEDs as incandescent light bulb replacements?

Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[ARES CORP] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:24:01 -0500

202 lines

New Thread

Wire lubricant

Wire lubricant

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:28:24 +0000

37 lines

Re: Wire lubricant

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:08:36 +0000

62 lines

Wire lubricant

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:38:59 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

[OT] Counting parts on reels

[OT] Counting parts on reels

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:14:53 -0500

22 lines

Re: [OT] Counting parts on reels

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:23:19 -0500

31 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager