LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


June 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

答复: [TN] Good-by (1 message)
(NTC) Amazon Review - Denon Cable (3 messages)
0201 and Hi-rel Equipment (5 messages)
AW: [TN] Sn60/Pb40 RoHS??????????? (1 message)
Best Board Finish - beyond gold (42 messages)
BGA ball dewet from substrate (14 messages)
Black Pad? (27 messages)
Board Warp Rework (2 messages)
CAMtastic... (13 messages)
Ceramic resistor coating (4 messages)
CF-8 Formula Calculator Software (3 messages)
Chip insufficient by Selective soldering (2 messages)
Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes (4 messages)
Connector Dust Caps (3 messages)
Developing Operator box assembly work instructions from SolidWorks files (1 message)
Equipment used to check soldering Irons (2 messages)
ESD Cardboard boxes??? (3 messages)
ESD Protection Verification Versus Humidity Below 30% (2 messages)
Flat HASL (1 message)
Flying Probe Testers (2 messages)
FW: [TN] Pre-form Round plastic mold (1 message)
Good-by (7 messages)
gridlock cleaning service (2 messages)
H2O+ (7 messages)
HASL is becoming a Hassle... (1 message)
HASL is becomming a Hassle... (3 messages)
Have you seen this? (4 messages)
Hot bar soldering machine (2 messages)
How much damage is too much damage? (3 messages)
How to determine Burn In duration? (8 messages)
How to solder this? (3 messages)
IPC Urging IEEE Members to Get Involved in Ballot on "Environmentally Preferable Electronic Equipment" (1 message)
IPC-2221 (2 messages)
IPC-2222 (7 messages)
Keep out distance from Sharp edge blade (2 messages)
Lost item found. (NTC) (6 messages)
Microscope Cameras (3 messages)
Min fillet height gull/J vs. L (8 messages)
New report finds tin whiskers to blame in Toyota UA (1 message)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer (5 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question (28 messages)
NTC: Strathmore's Whos Who Publication (3 messages)
Opti Print 1616PD (1 message)
PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement (5 messages)
PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8 (6 messages)
PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes (19 messages)
Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's (4 messages)
Posting of Amp crimping document (2 messages)
Potting over Conformal Coat? (5 messages)
Pre-form Round plastic mold (5 messages)
PWB - Thermal Stress - TM650, 2.6.8 (1 message)
R: [TN] To all stencils expert out there (1 message)
Re-balling BGAs (16 messages)
Revised RoHS Directive Adopted in EU (1 message)
RF cable layout (5 messages)
Rohacell 31HF (3 messages)
Samtec SEAMArray connector (1 message)
Should inspectors be able to see? (21 messages)
SMART RoHS Recast event (1 message)
Sn60/Pb40 RoHS??????????? (6 messages)
Solder paste (3 messages)
Solder paste Storage and Use (7 messages)
Solder wicking on component topside at 1st level (3 messages)
Solderpaste Storage and Use (33 messages)
The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB. (7 messages)
The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dryfilm) over populated PCB. (3 messages)
Thermal Stress, TM650, 2.6.8 (1 message)
Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections (4 messages)
To all stencils expert out there (4 messages)
Toyota whiskers story thread (2 messages)
TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING (6 messages)
Troubling IEEE Standards on Environmentally Preferable Imaging Equipment and TVs Go to Ballot in One Month (3 messages)
Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3 (4 messages)
Wire adds to press fit connectors (4 messages)
X-Out Policy (7 messages)
[COM] Strapping Adjacent BGA Vias (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

答复: [TN] Good-by

答复: [TN] Good-by

yangwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:56:10 +0800

108 lines

New Thread

(NTC) Amazon Review - Denon Cable

(NTC) Amazon Review - Denon Cable

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:50:53 -0500

35 lines

Re: (NTC) Amazon Review - Denon Cable

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:51:32 +0300

59 lines

Re: (NTC) Amazon Review - Denon Cable

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:41:30 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

Loa Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:04:43 -0500

33 lines

Re: 0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

Tim Buchwalter (Nytec Inc) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:00 +0000

69 lines

Re: 0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:57:39 +0000

70 lines

Re: 0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

ALLEN, LOA <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:54:15 -0700

92 lines

Re: 0201 and Hi-rel Equipment

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:58:11 +0000

130 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

AW: [TN] Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Torsten Hagge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:26:58 +0200

139 lines

New Thread

Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:16:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:18:43 -0500

77 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:38:00 -0400

117 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:14:25 -0700

98 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:18:45 -0700

86 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Aleks Lozinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:30:17 +0000

118 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:01:39 -0500

81 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:15:34 -0400

66 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:22:08 -0500

95 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:37:51 -0500

114 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:45:39 -0500

125 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:59:40 -0700

100 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:08:51 -0400

127 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:09:10 -0400

144 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:17:35 -0700

192 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:36:40 -0400

228 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:44:38 -0700

302 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:56:38 -0500

188 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:58:24 -0400

334 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:00:12 -0500

230 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:16:13 -0500

295 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:33:24 +0000

310 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:37:18 +0000

304 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:00:31 -0500

355 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:18:03 -0400

355 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:20:33 -0400

351 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:22:56 -0700

409 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:30:23 -0400

324 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:46:47 -0700

382 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:37:30 -0700

352 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:48:37 -0500

371 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:25:48 -0500

86 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:11:35 -0400

397 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:59:17 -0400

150 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

MacFadden, Todd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:41:54 -0400

372 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:00:07 -0500

401 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:33:53 -0400

436 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:18:16 -0500

236 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:55:45 -0500

267 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:47:11 +0000

342 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:19:39 -0400

378 lines

Re: Best Board Finish - beyond gold

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:40:54 -0500

362 lines

New Thread

BGA ball dewet from substrate

BGA ball dewet from substrate

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:05:14 -0500

31 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:06:04 -0400

73 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:10:25 -0600

91 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:12:17 +0000

64 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:13:50 -0500

119 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:13:18 +0000

95 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:25:00 -0500

140 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:29:15 -0500

28 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:49:11 -0700

79 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:42:27 -0400

140 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:02:20 +0000

143 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:34:26 -0500

62 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:56:44 -0600

81 lines

Re: BGA ball dewet from substrate

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:29:32 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

Black Pad?

Black Pad?

Gary Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:45:37 -0500

40 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:46:24 -0500

88 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:59:17 -0400

89 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:21:59 -0400

139 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:23:09 -0400

56 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:29:36 -0400

83 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:36:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:38:17 -0500

140 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Tontis, Theodore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:58:38 -0400

174 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Gary Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:19:07 -0500

211 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:52:15 -0400

43 lines

Re: Black Pad?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:56:26 -0500

153 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:59:58 -0400

258 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:10:48 -0400

206 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:11:35 -0400

253 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:12:00 -0700

158 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Gary Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:19:50 -0500

262 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:19:41 -0700

359 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:49:27 -0400

190 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:30:36 -0400

49 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Anil kher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:08:25 +0530

209 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:14:37 -0500

280 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Anil kher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:27:45 +0530

264 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:58:36 -0500

27 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:09:30 -0400

64 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Gary Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:49:09 -0500

95 lines

Re: Black Pad?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:56:05 -0700

174 lines

New Thread

Board Warp Rework

Board Warp Rework

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:22:16 -0400

54 lines

Re: Board Warp Rework

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:43:25 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

CAMtastic...

CAMtastic...

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:18:46 -0400

40 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:27:49 -0400

66 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:30:46 -0400

81 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:31:23 -0400

73 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Chris Knudsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:19:17 -0400

67 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Robert Wolfe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:27:22 -0400

78 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:39:52 -0400

74 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:55:43 -0400

107 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:57:32 -0400

153 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:05:14 +0100

84 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:14:06 -0400

157 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Gary Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:54:01 -0500

206 lines

Re: CAMtastic...

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:26:27 -0400

236 lines

New Thread

Ceramic resistor coating

Ceramic resistor coating

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:16:15 -0500

35 lines

Re: Ceramic resistor coating

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:05:08 -0400

93 lines

Re: Ceramic resistor coating

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:09:43 -0500

128 lines

Re: Ceramic resistor coating

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:58:57 -0400

175 lines

New Thread

CF-8 Formula Calculator Software

CF-8 Formula Calculator Software

Nina Preston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:46:30 -0500

35 lines

Re: CF-8 Formula Calculator Software

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:20:25 -0400

82 lines

Re: CF-8 Formula Calculator Software

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:49:34 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

Chip insufficient by Selective soldering

Chip insufficient by Selective soldering

Luan Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:17:51 +0700

57 lines

Re: Chip insufficient by Selective soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:32:03 -0500

97 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes

Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:53:20 -0500

34 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:14:26 +0000

62 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:40:19 -0300

73 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Measurement - rounded anvil mikes

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:10:36 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

Connector Dust Caps

Connector Dust Caps

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:44:37 -0400

71 lines

Re: Connector Dust Caps

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:10:24 -0700

121 lines

Re: Connector Dust Caps

Jim Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:25:38 -0400

162 lines

New Thread

Developing Operator box assembly work instructions from SolidWorks files

Developing Operator box assembly work instructions from SolidWorks files

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:30:36 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

Equipment used to check soldering Irons

Equipment used to check soldering Irons

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:50:01 -0400

53 lines

Re: Equipment used to check soldering Irons

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:09:31 -0700

94 lines

New Thread

ESD Cardboard boxes???

ESD Cardboard boxes???

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:15:50 -0500

42 lines

Re: ESD Cardboard boxes???

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:02:18 -0700

151 lines

Re: ESD Cardboard boxes???

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:15:33 +0300

84 lines

New Thread

ESD Protection Verification Versus Humidity Below 30%

ESD Protection Verification Versus Humidity Below 30%

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:05:59 -0400

88 lines

Re: ESD Protection Verification Versus Humidity Below 30%

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:37:18 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

Flat HASL

Flat HASL

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:08:24 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Flying Probe Testers

Flying Probe Testers

Rick Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:07:38 -0500

103 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:33:35 -0400

190 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Pre-form Round plastic mold

FW: [TN] Pre-form Round plastic mold

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:22:05 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

Good-by

Re: Good-by

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:57:14 -0400

60 lines

Re: Good-by

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:55:09 -0400

98 lines

Re: Good-by

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:59:29 -0400

107 lines

Re: Good-by

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:54 -0400

96 lines

Re: Good-by

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:02:53 +0800

100 lines

Re: Good-by

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:26:32 -0700

99 lines

Re: Good-by

Russell Kido <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:25:21 -0700

203 lines

New Thread

gridlock cleaning service

Re: gridlock cleaning service

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:30:08 -0700

234 lines

Re: gridlock cleaning service

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:43:37 -0400

252 lines

New Thread

H2O+

H2O+

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:43:26 -0500

36 lines

Re: H2O+

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:18:23 -0400

131 lines

Re: H2O+

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:52:28 -0600

173 lines

Re: H2O+

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:34:21 -0500

206 lines

Re: H2O+

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:29:07 -0700

267 lines

Re: H2O+

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:35:17 -0400

359 lines

Re: H2O+

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:40:02 -0500

387 lines

New Thread

HASL is becoming a Hassle...

Re: HASL is becoming a Hassle...

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:15:43 -0400

98 lines

New Thread

HASL is becomming a Hassle...

HASL is becomming a Hassle...

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:00:05 -0400

51 lines

Re: HASL is becomming a Hassle...

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:04:36 -0500

82 lines

Re: HASL is becomming a Hassle...

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:06:22 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

Have you seen this?

Have you seen this?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:44:19 -0400

116 lines

Re: Have you seen this?

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:55 -0500

147 lines

Re: Have you seen this?

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:59:13 -0400

163 lines

Re: Have you seen this?

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:40:31 -0700

207 lines

New Thread

Hot bar soldering machine

Hot bar soldering machine

Dominic Boudreau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:45:13 -0400

51 lines

Re: Hot bar soldering machine

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:20:39 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

How much damage is too much damage?

How much damage is too much damage?

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:30:36 -0400

46 lines

Re: How much damage is too much damage?

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:51:25 -0400

71 lines

Re: How much damage is too much damage?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:04:49 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

How to determine Burn In duration?

How to determine Burn In duration?

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:59:51 -0700

54 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:03:57 -0400

94 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Jim Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:19:09 -0400

115 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:21:09 -0400

107 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:29:38 +0000

102 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Rivera, Raye <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:42:30 -0700

172 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 05:20:10 -0400

216 lines

Re: How to determine Burn In duration?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:43:23 -0400

187 lines

New Thread

How to solder this?

How to solder this?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:56:11 -0400

58 lines

Re: How to solder this?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:32:04 -0400

101 lines

Re: How to solder this?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:00:51 +0100

109 lines

New Thread

IPC Urging IEEE Members to Get Involved in Ballot on "Environmentally Preferable Electronic Equipment"

Re: IPC Urging IEEE Members to Get Involved in Ballot on "Environmentally Preferable Electronic Equipment"

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:17:35 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

IPC-2221

IPC-2221

Micahel T. Handy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:18:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: IPC-2221

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:52:08 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

IPC-2222

Re: IPC-2222

Donald Kyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:12:34 +0000

83 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:12:05 -0500

145 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:29:09 -0400

195 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:39:31 -0500

187 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:42:44 -0400

235 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:43:49 -0500

227 lines

Re: IPC-2222

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:51:40 -0400

252 lines

New Thread

Keep out distance from Sharp edge blade

Re: Keep out distance from Sharp edge blade

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:05:36 +0800

79 lines

Re: Keep out distance from Sharp edge blade

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:44:42 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

Lost item found. (NTC)

Lost item found. (NTC)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:53:13 -0500

34 lines

Re: Lost item found. (NTC)

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:58:37 -0500

58 lines

Re: Lost item found. (NTC)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:59:49 -0500

71 lines

Re: Lost item found. (NTC)

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:41:17 -0500

100 lines

Re: Lost item found. (NTC)

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:41:47 -0500

92 lines

Re: Lost item found. (NTC)

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:00 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Microscope Cameras

Microscope Cameras

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 05:40:51 -0400

83 lines

Re: Microscope Cameras

Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:57:18 +0100

127 lines

Re: Microscope Cameras

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:42:10 -0700

171 lines

New Thread

Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:20:50 -0400

41 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:07 -0500

91 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:40:53 -0500

125 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:05 -0500

74 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:50:44 -0400

107 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:55:12 -0500

130 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:48:31 -0500

137 lines

Re: Min fillet height gull/J vs. L

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:46:17 -0500

165 lines

New Thread

New report finds tin whiskers to blame in Toyota UA

Re: New report finds tin whiskers to blame in Toyota UA

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:50:29 -0400

233 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:30:06 -0500

149 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:19:53 -0500

149 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:50:15 -0700

189 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:42:10 -0700

225 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:26:54 -0500

151 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:21:56 -0500

130 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:25:07 -0400

164 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:46:09 +0100

172 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:43:23 -0500

135 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:00:49 -0700

174 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:40:00 -0400

187 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:45:09 -0400

215 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:49:16 -0400

239 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:52:36 -0400

248 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:45 -0400

283 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:21:44 +0100

355 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:23:27 -0400

306 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:22:55 -0400

373 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:28:17 -0400

272 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:20:34 -0500

402 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:24:18 -0400

451 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:32:07 -0500

296 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:34:29 -0500

488 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:38:49 -0400

330 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:49:21 -0500

354 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:35:16 +0100

498 lines

NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:14:02 -0500

134 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:18:35 +0000

184 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:46:56 -0400

163 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:24:36 -0500

163 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:40:32 -0400

195 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Kenneth J. Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:03:13 -0400

185 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:22:47 -0400

209 lines

New Thread

NTC: Strathmore's Whos Who Publication

NTC: Strathmore's Whos Who Publication

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:46:59 -0400

30 lines

Re: NTC: Strathmore's Whos Who Publication

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:22:46 -0500

78 lines

Re: NTC: Strathmore's Whos Who Publication

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:47:23 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

Opti Print 1616PD

Opti Print 1616PD

Dan Mauro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:33:00 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:47:54 -0700

63 lines

Re: PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:36:44 -0500

105 lines

Re: PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:12:33 -0700

108 lines

Re: PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:16 -0400

180 lines

Re: PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:10:34 -0700

101 lines

New Thread

PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:35:22 -0500

64 lines

Re: PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:52:26 -0400

107 lines

Re: PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:57:41 -0700

100 lines

Re: PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:54:28 -0400

125 lines

Re: PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:03:54 -0700

148 lines

Re: PCB/PWB - Thermal Stress - Solder Float - TM650, 2.6.8

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:15:42 -0700

172 lines

New Thread

PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:24:19 -0400

75 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:36:27 -0400

117 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:06:06 -0400

160 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:10:33 -0400

181 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:14:15 -0400

222 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:24 -0400

242 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

MaryJane Chism <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:35:34 -0400

206 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:50:50 -0400

260 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

MaryJane Chism <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:43:52 -0400

226 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:56:45 -0400

305 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:15 -0600

287 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:36:21 -0400

345 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:09:26 +0300

121 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:19:30 -0600

151 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:38:31 -0500

155 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:04:33 -0600

194 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:18:39 -0500

190 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:37:54 -0600

220 lines

Re: PCBA Inspection for Solder Balls/Splashes

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:23:12 -0500

224 lines

New Thread

Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's

Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:59:56 -0400

45 lines

Re: Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:09:13 -0500

75 lines

Re: Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:11:54 -0400

88 lines

Re: Plugged & Tented Vias Under MELF's

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:28:55 +0300

88 lines

New Thread

Posting of Amp crimping document

Posting of Amp crimping document

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:11:04 -0400

46 lines

Re: Posting of Amp crimping document

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:28:40 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Potting over Conformal Coat?

Potting over Conformal Coat?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0500

42 lines

Re: Potting over Conformal Coat?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:59:17 -0500

105 lines

Re: Potting over Conformal Coat?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0500

101 lines

Re: Potting over Conformal Coat?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:52:35 -0400

149 lines

Re: Potting over Conformal Coat?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:05:36 -0400

155 lines

New Thread

Pre-form Round plastic mold

Pre-form Round plastic mold

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:32:04 -0500

36 lines

Re: Pre-form Round plastic mold

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:17:54 -0500

66 lines

Re: Pre-form Round plastic mold

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:40:57 -0400

69 lines

Re: Pre-form Round plastic mold

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:58:31 -0400

72 lines

Re: Pre-form Round plastic mold

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:13:56 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

PWB - Thermal Stress - TM650, 2.6.8

PWB - Thermal Stress - TM650, 2.6.8

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:23:34 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] To all stencils expert out there

R: [TN] To all stencils expert out there

SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:00:42 +0200

88 lines

New Thread

Re-balling BGAs

Re-balling BGAs

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:21:33 -0400

49 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Harp, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:53:48 +0000

84 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:56:38 -0400

117 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:43:12 -0500

80 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:02:40 -0400

120 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:04:36 -0400

160 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:32:40 -0500

191 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:19:33 -0500

118 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:29:10 -0500

138 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:33:11 -0400

165 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:34:38 -0400

187 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:38:31 -0400

211 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:32:52 -0300

160 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:55:33 -0500

175 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:34:16 -0400

92 lines

Re: Re-balling BGAs

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Jun 2011 13:19:52 +0300

93 lines

New Thread

Revised RoHS Directive Adopted in EU

Revised RoHS Directive Adopted in EU

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:49:42 -0400

96 lines

New Thread

RF cable layout

RF cable layout

İlknur Baylakoğlu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:27:30 +0000

50 lines

Re: RF cable layout

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:41:48 -0400

89 lines

Re: RF cable layout

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:15:25 +0100

98 lines

Re: RF cable layout

İlknur Baylakoğlu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:32:46 +0000

137 lines

Re: RF cable layout

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:35:21 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

Rohacell 31HF

Rohacell 31HF

Kenneth J. Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:52:31 -0400

50 lines

Re: Rohacell 31HF

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:41:48 +0100

96 lines

Re: Rohacell 31HF

Kenneth J. Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:07:40 -0400

129 lines

New Thread

Samtec SEAMArray connector

Re: Samtec SEAMArray connector

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:41:11 -0700

144 lines

New Thread

Should inspectors be able to see?

Should inspectors be able to see?

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:25:12 -0600

33 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:40:48 -0400

60 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:49:44 -0400

93 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Karen Capps <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:51:11 -0400

171 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:54:02 -0400

155 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:15:10 -0500

184 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:23:45 -0600

127 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:25:54 -0400

166 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:27:58 -0400

217 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:29:58 -0400

116 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:33:11 -0700

167 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:36:16 -0400

205 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:36:42 -0400

190 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:51:16 -0400

270 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:00:54 -0600

193 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:20:12 -0500

90 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:20:19 -0700

136 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:09:56 -0700

283 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:08:00 +0300

163 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:10:27 +0100

59 lines

Re: Should inspectors be able to see?

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:45:56 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

SMART RoHS Recast event

SMART RoHS Recast event

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:26:10 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:59:12 +0300

45 lines

Re: Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:02:43 -0400

57 lines

Re: Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:05:24 -0400

87 lines

Re: Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:16:01 -0400

87 lines

Re: Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:32:02 -0400

111 lines

Re: Sn60/Pb40 RoHS???????????

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:43:05 +0100

179 lines

New Thread

Solder paste

Solder paste

jonathan noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:25:30 -0400

69 lines

Re: Solder paste

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:41:40 +0100

115 lines

Re: Solder paste

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:06:41 -0700

132 lines

New Thread

Solder paste Storage and Use

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:00:26 +0100

328 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:47:39 -0500

402 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:01:16 -0500

456 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:55:24 -0400

481 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:01:47 -0400

475 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Goodyear, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:03:03 -0700

498 lines

Re: Solder paste Storage and Use

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:44:41 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Solder wicking on component topside at 1st level

Solder wicking on component topside at 1st level

Sri Maganti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:18:34 -0500

32 lines

Re: Solder wicking on component topside at 1st level

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:21:51 -0400

80 lines

Re: Solder wicking on component topside at 1st level

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:03:44 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Solderpaste Storage and Use

Solderpaste Storage and Use

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:28:23 -0400

58 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:06:08 -0400

102 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:21 -0500

130 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:21:06 -0700

205 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:26:11 -0400

180 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:49:13 -0500

233 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:55:09 -0700

332 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:21:59 -0400

333 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:22:30 -0400

283 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:29:50 -0400

145 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:25:16 -0700

419 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:03:45 -0400

394 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:12:40 -0400

283 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:48:50 -0500

310 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:10:05 -0400

311 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:14:42 -0400

411 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:32:47 -0400

55 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:37:35 -0500

441 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:50:19 -0400

412 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:04 -0500

353 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:01:26 -0500

384 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:52:16 -0400

417 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:45 -0400

451 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:13:57 -0700

494 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:23:56 -0500

421 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:40:28 -0300

536 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:57:24 -0500

546 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:10:03 -0500

567 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:20:56 -0700

516 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:36:25 -0400

46 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:53:34 -0700

114 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:01:08 -0500

135 lines

Re: Solderpaste Storage and Use

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:04:59 -0700

201 lines

New Thread

The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

andi1978 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:23:36 +0200

62 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:32:00 -0400

99 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:12:08 -0500

124 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:28:59 -0500

182 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:21:17 -0600

92 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:03:58 -0500

161 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dry film) over populated PCB.

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:14:37 -0600

232 lines

New Thread

The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dryfilm) over populated PCB.

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dryfilm) over populated PCB.

Andrzej Zielinski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:16:36 +0000

43 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dryfilm) over populated PCB.

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:07:16 -0400

39 lines

Re: The best method to measure acrylic conformal coating thickness (dryfilm) over populated PCB.

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:20:57 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Thermal Stress, TM650, 2.6.8

Thermal Stress, TM650, 2.6.8

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:53:27 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections

Re: Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:56:32 +0300

61 lines

Re: Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:50:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:46:02 -0400

75 lines

Re: Tinning Stranded Wire - Crimped Connections

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:25:55 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

To all stencils expert out there

To all stencils expert out there

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:34 -0400

46 lines

Re: To all stencils expert out there

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:31:26 -0700

85 lines

Re: To all stencils expert out there

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:02:04 -0400

99 lines

Re: To all stencils expert out there

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:14:57 -0700

122 lines

New Thread

Toyota whiskers story thread

Toyota whiskers story thread

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:14:28 -0400

38 lines

Re: Toyota whiskers story thread

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:54:33 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Lars Wallin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:16:10 -0500

45 lines

Re: TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Francesco Di Maio <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:18:51 +0200

121 lines

Re: TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:33:48 +0300

99 lines

Re: TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:51:34 +0100

157 lines

Re: TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:00:26 -0500

97 lines

Re: TRANSPARANT BARE BOARD FOR CLEANING TESTING

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:29:36 -0400

141 lines

New Thread

Troubling IEEE Standards on Environmentally Preferable Imaging Equipment and TVs Go to Ballot in One Month

Troubling IEEE Standards on Environmentally Preferable Imaging Equipment and TVs Go to Ballot in One Month

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:26:19 -0500

120 lines

Re: Troubling IEEE Standards on Environmentally Preferable Imaging Equipment and TVs Go to Ballot in One Month

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:26:28 -0400

161 lines

Re: Troubling IEEE Standards on Environmentally Preferable Imaging Equipment and TVs Go to Ballot in One Month

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:34:13 -0400

402 lines

New Thread

Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3

Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:12:25 -0700

69 lines

Re: Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:47:44 -0400

119 lines

Re: Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:53:11 -0500

121 lines

Re: Using PWBs instead of test coupons to meet IPC-6012 Class 3

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:02:35 -0400

148 lines

New Thread

Wire adds to press fit connectors

Wire adds to press fit connectors

Marsico, James - ES <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:17:30 -0400

54 lines

Re: Wire adds to press fit connectors

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:29 -0400

89 lines

Re: Wire adds to press fit connectors

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:49:56 -0400

96 lines

Re: Wire adds to press fit connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:34:58 -0500

125 lines

New Thread

X-Out Policy

X-Out Policy

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:21:53 -0400

43 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:49:38 -0400

87 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:08:38 -0400

119 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:18:31 -0400

81 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:43 -0700

131 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

Pete <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:11:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: X-Out Policy

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:07:53 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

[COM] Strapping Adjacent BGA Vias

[COM] Strapping Adjacent BGA Vias

GRIVON Arnaud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:46:11 +0200

44 lines

Re: [COM] Strapping Adjacent BGA Vias

GRIVON Arnaud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:19:47 +0200

89 lines

Re: [COM] Strapping Adjacent BGA Vias

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:03:35 -0500

143 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager