LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


September 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

答复: [TN] Is green solder mask the defa ult by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage? (1 message)
'certification' to RoHS (11 messages)
7095 BGA void criteria (4 messages)
analytical determination of stainless flavor (5 messages)
Anisotropic Conductive Film (1 message)
ANSI/ESD-S-20.20 (14 messages)
Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantiti... (1 message)
Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantities? (1 message)
Asian source for Moisture Barrier Bags (MBB) for packaging raw PWBs. (1 message)
Bergquist Gap Pad (4 messages)
Book to bill ratio (8 messages)
Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed (26 messages)
Cleaning No Clean Flux (20 messages)
Conformal Coating Masking Tape (1 message)
Crack and oxidisation on IC leads (14 messages)
Energy Usage of Equipment (4 messages)
EXTERNAL: [TN] Cleaning Baskets for In-Line Cleaners (1 message)
FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8 (3 messages)
FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION, (4 messages)
FW: Round the clock: a coupon's actual mis-registration is always worse than can be seen in any single mount's cross-section. (1 message)
FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating (5 messages)
Galvanize Steel (1 message)
glue dot standards (4 messages)
Golden finger discoloration Judgement criteria after rework. (1 message)
Hand Soldering (32 messages)
How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the barrel (1 message)
How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel (10 messages)
humid environments and long term reliability (6 messages)
Inge's e-mail address (6 messages)
IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker (5 messages)
IPC-WHA-620 and J-001 (6 messages)
Is 7 minute 160C snap cure substantially damaging or benign? (2 messages)
Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage? (6 messages)
JPL standard D8208 (2 messages)
Laser de-panilization (3 messages)
Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt (6 messages)
looking for castellation board vendor recommendation (9 messages)
Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN (5 messages)
Next Friday Element Quiz (2 messages)
NTC - green solder mask - IS NOT "GREEN"? (3 messages)
NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage? (6 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy (4 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Answer (2 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question (10 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer (11 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question (16 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer (7 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question (13 messages)
NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Answer (1 message)
NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question (13 messages)
NTC-humid environments and long term reliability (1 message)
NTC: Friday quiz 18 (18 messages)
NTC: Friday quiz 19 (1 message)
PCB Heatsink Pads (6 messages)
PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins (9 messages)
Plastic and elastic properties of SAC305 (2 messages)
Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs (4 messages)
Questions related to J-STD-001E (5 messages)
Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker (11 messages)
Repair/Rework Standards (11 messages)
Resistor part numbers (9 messages)
Response to Ahne (6 messages)
Silkscreen (2 messages)
Software Comparison (1 message)
Solderability of nickel plating (30 messages)
Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures (5 messages)
Stencil thickness v solder paste height (10 messages)
Stencil thickness v solder paste height - Character set not allowed (2 messages)
Steve Wozniak to headline IPC APEX EXPO 2011 - vote on his topic! (1 message)
Steve Wozniak Voting - third try (1 message)
Steve Wozniak Voting Link (1 message)
Supplier Quality Response Engineer position (1 message)
Tin Whiskers elimination article (2 messages)
TNC-Cleaning No Clean Flux (3 messages)
Torque or Hand-Tighten Self Locking Nuts? (2 messages)
Via fill quality (2 messages)
Wave Temperature Overshoot (10 messages)
Wave Temperature Overshoot - Mercury (2 messages)
Weight of water on board after rinse / blow off. (3 messages)
Wetting on the thermal pad of DPAKs (1 message)
Where about of "Tom Clifford" (6 messages)
[DC] Equal Signal Lengths on High Speed Designs (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

答复: [TN] Is green solder mask the defa ult by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

答复: [TN] Is green solder mask the defa ult by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

yangwen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:42:59 +0800

109 lines

New Thread

'certification' to RoHS

'certification' to RoHS

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:15:07 -0400

42 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:30:41 -0400

118 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:07:30 -0400

164 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Brad Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:10:25 -0400

87 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:11:56 -0400

309 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:59:26 -0400

129 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:00:10 +0100

303 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:02:29 -0400

407 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:58:32 -0400

41 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:20:46 +0100

112 lines

Re: 'certification' to RoHS

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:28:25 -0400

159 lines

New Thread

7095 BGA void criteria

7095 BGA void criteria

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:31:08 -0400

45 lines

Re: 7095 BGA void criteria

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:27:22 -0400

86 lines

Re: 7095 BGA void criteria

Ashok Dhawan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:31:56 -0500

34 lines

Re: 7095 BGA void criteria

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:23:32 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

analytical determination of stainless flavor

analytical determination of stainless flavor

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:01:26 -0400

36 lines

Re: analytical determination of stainless flavor

Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:42:58 -0700

67 lines

Re: analytical determination of stainless flavor

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:44:45 -0500

66 lines

Re: analytical determination of stainless flavor

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:49:31 -0500

84 lines

Re: analytical determination of stainless flavor

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:55:09 -0400

101 lines

New Thread

Anisotropic Conductive Film

Anisotropic Conductive Film

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:31:44 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:38:21 -0400

43 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:45:17 -0500

94 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:48:36 -0700

77 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:50:51 -0400

135 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:56:10 -0700

89 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:06:18 -0400

136 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Hart, Dale L CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RXSA <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:11:58 -0400

103 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:29:18 -0500

189 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:53:59 -0500

75 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:56:04 -0500

107 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:58:22 -0500

129 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:29:36 -0700

88 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:32:07 -0500

189 lines

Re: ANSI/ESD-S-20.20

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:39:59 -0700

232 lines

New Thread

Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantiti...

Re: Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantiti...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:09:37 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantities?

Re: Anybody know of a good source for Loctite products in small quantities?

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:13:05 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

Asian source for Moisture Barrier Bags (MBB) for packaging raw PWBs.

Asian source for Moisture Barrier Bags (MBB) for packaging raw PWBs.

Gerald Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:37:47 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Bergquist Gap Pad

Bergquist Gap Pad

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:25:36 -0400

42 lines

Re: Bergquist Gap Pad

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:17:17 -0400

122 lines

Re: Bergquist Gap Pad

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:34:54 -0400

67 lines

Re: Bergquist Gap Pad

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:52:53 -0400

436 lines

New Thread

Book to bill ratio

Book to bill ratio

cguitar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:24:50 +0800

36 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:27:10 -0400

97 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:59:49 -0500

140 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:08:22 -0500

80 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:11:03 +0100

58 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:16:49 -0400

98 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:15:10 -0500

87 lines

Re: Book to bill ratio

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:26:14 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:46:01 -0500

53 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:49:53 -0400

76 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:24:39 -0400

136 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:31:31 -0400

160 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:41:46 -0400

189 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:42:35 -0400

240 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:44:13 -0400

282 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:45:43 -0400

324 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:50:17 -0400

337 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:56:37 -0700

117 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:10:20 -0400

363 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:35:22 -0400

184 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Harvey Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:06:50 -0700

430 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 05:44:00 -0400

234 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:45:46 -0400

476 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:20:38 +0100

301 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:33:06 -0500

122 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:47:34 -0500

165 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:53:21 -0400

224 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:54:25 +0100

162 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:00:31 -0500

181 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:19:00 -0500

223 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:22:26 -0300

289 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:25:54 -0700

125 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:26:48 -0400

165 lines

Re: Chance to remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:14:56 -0500

208 lines

New Thread

Cleaning No Clean Flux

Cleaning No Clean Flux

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:40:43 -0400

62 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:49:53 -0400

108 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Rick Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:56:33 -0500

113 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:57:17 -0400

115 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:59:35 -0400

145 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:58:18 -0500

124 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Woolley, Mark D. (Mark) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:03:48 -0600

168 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:05:36 +0300

107 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:05:47 -0400

158 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:06:26 -0400

107 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:21:09 -0400

168 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:42:58 -0500

209 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:53:20 -0500

119 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:55:19 -0500

175 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:57:25 -0500

221 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:22:27 -0500

206 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:24:33 -0400

256 lines

Cleaning No Clean Flux

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:12:14 -0700

44 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:21:53 -0500

76 lines

Re: Cleaning No Clean Flux

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:37:21 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Masking Tape

Conformal Coating Masking Tape

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:25:47 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:07:22 +0800

47 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:47:35 +0000

62 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:22:55 -0400

81 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:00:39 -0400

121 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:51:48 -0700

108 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:15:10 -0500

154 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:28:02 -0400

141 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:45:42 -0500

171 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:01:18 -0400

224 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:18:55 -0400

220 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:32:27 -0700

282 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Gobinathan Athimolom <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:07:14 +0800

219 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:37:31 +0800

235 lines

Re: Crack and oxidisation on IC leads

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:00:40 +0200

201 lines

New Thread

Energy Usage of Equipment

Energy Usage of Equipment

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:24:19 -0500

42 lines

Re: Energy Usage of Equipment

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:29:01 +0100

99 lines

Re: Energy Usage of Equipment

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:36:47 +0000

187 lines

Re: Energy Usage of Equipment

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:07:07 -0400

218 lines

New Thread

EXTERNAL: [TN] Cleaning Baskets for In-Line Cleaners

Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] Cleaning Baskets for In-Line Cleaners

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:33:25 +0000

177 lines

New Thread

FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:07:05 -0500

398 lines

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:31:36 -0400

851 lines

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:18:59 -0400

3982 lines

New Thread

FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION,

FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION,

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:02:15 -0500

150 lines

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION,

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:21:12 -0700

185 lines

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION,

Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:58:06 -0700

235 lines

Re: FW: IPC-TM-650, 2.6.8, BAKING OF PWB QUESTION,

Joe Venditti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:08:46 -0400

174 lines

New Thread

FW: Round the clock: a coupon's actual mis-registration is always worse than can be seen in any single mount's cross-section.

FW: Round the clock: a coupon's actual mis-registration is always worse than can be seen in any single mount's cross-section.

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:29:51 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:12:33 -0700

633 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:55:32 +0200

664 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:02:05 +0200

666 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:53:27 -0700

682 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Solderability of nickel plating

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:58:01 -0700

704 lines

New Thread

Galvanize Steel

Galvanize Steel

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:24:03 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

glue dot standards

glue dot standards

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:07:41 -0600

31 lines

Re: glue dot standards

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:09:54 -0500

62 lines

Re: glue dot standards

Ken Harp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:23:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: glue dot standards

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:30:07 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Golden finger discoloration Judgement criteria after rework.

Golden finger discoloration Judgement criteria after rework.

yangwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:32:45 +0800

48 lines

New Thread

Hand Soldering

Hand Soldering

Kenneth Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 08:30:23 -0400

40 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:50:45 -0500

112 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Kenneth Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:11:06 -0400

145 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:20:49 -0500

197 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:40:22 -0500

252 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:27:49 -0400

86 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:13:30 -0500

155 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:45:22 -0400

185 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Kenneth Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:46:03 -0400

195 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:02:25 -0500

77 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:25:51 -0500

254 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:22:45 -0400

373 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:29:23 -0400

235 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:31:41 +0200

253 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:15:22 -0400

80 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:23:35 -0500

109 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:03:20 -0400

138 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert DeQuattro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:10:12 -0400

188 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:18:07 -0600

77 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:30:23 -0600

243 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:31:08 -0500

110 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:32:09 -0400

122 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:41:56 -0600

452 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:50:45 -0600

487 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:11:48 -0600

168 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:08:24 -0500

192 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:12:44 -0500

324 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:30:19 -0500

251 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:34:19 -0500

251 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:00:54 -0400

263 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:16:17 -0400

235 lines

Re: Hand Soldering

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:57:05 -0400

288 lines

New Thread

How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the barrel

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the barrel

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:53:01 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:14:09 +0000

23 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:44:06 +0000

39 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:06:06 -0500

39 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Gerald Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:26:52 -0400

93 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:36:20 +0000

82 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:41:57 -0500

126 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:25:01 -0400

86 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:15:05 -0500

140 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:31:34 -0400

39 lines

Re: How to measure thickness of ENIG plating inside the via barrel

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:38:57 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

humid environments and long term reliability

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Chris BALL <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:47:55 -0400

179 lines

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:52:05 -0500

254 lines

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:22:26 -0400

294 lines

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:51:35 -0600

404 lines

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:15:36 -0400

416 lines

Re: humid environments and long term reliability

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:38:02 -0500

519 lines

New Thread

Inge's e-mail address

Inge's e-mail address

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:27:24 -0400

35 lines

Re: Inge's e-mail address

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:44:48 -0700

71 lines

Re: Inge's e-mail address

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:46:48 -0400

44 lines

Re: Inge's e-mail address

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:54:08 -0400

138 lines

Re: Inge's e-mail address

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:05:56 -0500

45 lines

Re: Inge's e-mail address

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:13:32 +0200

84 lines

New Thread

IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

Paul O Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:58:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:07:42 +0100

63 lines

Re: IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:16:29 +0100

73 lines

Re: IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:42:47 +0000

107 lines

Re: IP67 - Gland + Threadlocker

Paul O Connor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:55:12 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:35:29 +0800

37 lines

Re: IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Brad Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:13:39 -0400

76 lines

Re: IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:21:32 -0400

66 lines

Re: IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:31:47 +0000

75 lines

Re: IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:38:41 -0500

128 lines

Re: IPC-WHA-620 and J-001

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:12:09 -0400

110 lines

New Thread

Is 7 minute 160C snap cure substantially damaging or benign?

Is 7 minute 160C snap cure substantially damaging or benign?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:15:42 +0000

44 lines

Re: Is 7 minute 160C snap cure substantially damaging or benign?

Brian Stumm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:25:03 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:35:00 -0700

37 lines

Re: Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:17:06 -0500

91 lines

Re: Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:23:47 -0500

132 lines

Re: Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:38:16 -0400

176 lines

Re: Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:55:29 -0500

64 lines

Re: Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Technet Legg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:36:06 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

JPL standard D8208

JPL standard D8208

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:58:37 -0700

83 lines

Re: JPL standard D8208

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:21:41 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

Laser de-panilization

Re: Laser de-panilization

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:39:44 -0500

315 lines

Re: Laser de-panilization

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:17:01 -0500

313 lines

Re: Laser de-panilization

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:59:26 +0100

341 lines

New Thread

Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:30:31 -0500

39 lines

Re: Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:53:38 -0700

89 lines

Re: Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:58:34 -0500

112 lines

Re: Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:46:03 -0400

103 lines

Re: Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:51:37 -0400

145 lines

Re: Leadfree Plated Thru Hole Thermal Cycle Reliability Paper Hunt

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:33:07 -0400

208 lines

New Thread

looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:56:54 -0700

46 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Bill Belanger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:10:21 -0500

102 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:03:30 -0400

100 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Brad Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:54:49 -0400

171 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:08:23 -0400

188 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:28:17 -0700

133 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:06:01 -0700

173 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:05:59 -0400

211 lines

Re: looking for castellation board vendor recommendation

Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:22:32 -0700

245 lines

New Thread

Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:28:16 -0400

61 lines

Re: Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:32:26 +0100

113 lines

Re: Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:37:45 -0500

92 lines

Re: Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:31:50 -0700

116 lines

Re: Maximum Number of Reflows for QFN

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:39:52 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

Next Friday Element Quiz

Next Friday Element Quiz

Harvey Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:24:28 -0700

29 lines

Re: Next Friday Element Quiz

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:43:25 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

NTC - green solder mask - IS NOT "GREEN"?

Re: NTC - green solder mask - IS NOT "GREEN"?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:02:44 -0400

78 lines

Re: NTC - green solder mask - IS NOT "GREEN"?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:49:49 -0400

117 lines

Re: NTC - green solder mask - IS NOT "GREEN"?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:09:17 -0400

156 lines

New Thread

NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:55:10 -0400

143 lines

Re: NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:24:36 -0400

167 lines

Re: NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:52:04 -0400

226 lines

Re: NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:55:15 -0500

185 lines

Re: NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:36:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: NTC - Re: [TN] Is green solder mask the default by any IPC standard or is it default by common usage?

Ken Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:03:45 -0700

260 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:54:53 -0500

38 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:34:43 -0400

75 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:49:26 -0500

110 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - Clumpy

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:10:02 -0700

117 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:15:18 -0500

93 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Answer

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:48:05 +0200

132 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:38:39 -0500

73 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:47:33 -0300

116 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:56:16 -0400

134 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:29:41 -0400

120 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:16:17 -0500

164 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Jason Roetz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:26:11 -0400

166 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Diljit Matharu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:29:22 -0700

175 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:49:45 -0500

204 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:31:30 +0200

113 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz - The Question

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:24:37 -0500

184 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:55:50 -0500

67 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:59:40 -0500

114 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:09:04 -0500

131 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:19:27 +0100

187 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:28:48 -0500

232 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:10:07 -0500

26 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:24:56 -0500

146 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:50:02 -0500

179 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:48:12 -0300

192 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:38:23 -0400

234 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Answer

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:30:08 -0400

220 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:22:39 -0500

56 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:24:18 -0400

106 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:27:16 -0500

95 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:48:03 -0400

80 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:38:18 +0100

142 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:05:07 -0500

109 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:13:01 -0400

160 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:16:07 -0500

179 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:26:36 -0400

161 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:42:42 -0500

205 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:59:01 -0400

240 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:07:19 -0400

142 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:10:49 -0500

172 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:18:03 -0400

123 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:43:38 -0500

248 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz On Thursday - the Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:51:25 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:01:01 -0500

66 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:08:24 +0100

140 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:53:59 -0400

131 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:59:47 -0300

45 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:14:52 +0100

103 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:41:33 -0700

136 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Answer

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:51:09 +0300

140 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:41:11 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:57:02 -0400

117 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:18:37 -0500

113 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:58:09 -0500

125 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:12:15 +0100

162 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:26:02 -0700

180 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:28:13 -0400

242 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:31:57 -0400

283 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:03:13 -0300

200 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:00:12 -0400

280 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:11:20 -0400

315 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:10:51 -0500

326 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz- the Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:12:27 -0500

369 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Answer

NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Answer

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:02:33 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:06:21 -0500

67 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:18:43 -0400

118 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:28:36 -0400

127 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:37:49 -0500

160 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:59:26 -0400

218 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:05:51 -0500

230 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:14:43 -0500

106 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:19:37 -0400

263 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:23:54 -0400

303 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:35:40 -0500

107 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

David R1 Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:50:17 -0500

134 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:52:06 +0100

133 lines

Re: NTC Friday Element Quiz: The Question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:58:12 -0700

308 lines

New Thread

NTC-humid environments and long term reliability

Re: NTC-humid environments and long term reliability

Chris BALL <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:04:53 -0400

273 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday quiz 18

NTC: Friday quiz 18

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:39:44 +0200

35 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:13:15 -0400

73 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Halas, Mirka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:24:27 -0400

130 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:27:12 -0400

58 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:29:20 -0700

87 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:29:22 -0700

135 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:29:27 -0400

119 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:00:26 -0400

119 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:03:45 +0200

91 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:05:27 +0200

153 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:11:23 +0200

106 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:13:41 -0400

203 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:31:45 -0400

261 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:32:18 -0400

248 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:33:42 -0700

141 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:37:55 -0400

291 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:55:37 +0200

244 lines

Re: NTC: Friday quiz 18

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:10:04 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday quiz 19

NTC: Friday quiz 19

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:40:06 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

PCB Heatsink Pads

PCB Heatsink Pads

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:06:05 -0400

46 lines

Re: PCB Heatsink Pads

Jason Roetz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:01:33 -0400

94 lines

Re: PCB Heatsink Pads

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:03:08 -0500

32 lines

Re: PCB Heatsink Pads

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:03:34 -0400

76 lines

Re: PCB Heatsink Pads

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:06:16 -0400

65 lines

Re: PCB Heatsink Pads

Jason Roetz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:09:12 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:19:16 -0500

39 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:53:15 -0400

87 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:59:09 -0400

128 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:55:18 -0700

185 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:02:12 -0700

211 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:10:46 -0400

262 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:42:44 -0700

315 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:36:04 -0700

235 lines

Re: PCB Indexing Pins / PWB Coupon pins

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:50:12 -0400

272 lines

New Thread

Plastic and elastic properties of SAC305

Plastic and elastic properties of SAC305

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:55:38 -0700

38 lines

Re: Plastic and elastic properties of SAC305

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:24:02 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs

Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs

Uppina Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:41:34 +0530

55 lines

Re: Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs

John Koleszar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:32:06 -0400

90 lines

Re: Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs

Uppina Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:53:55 +0530

120 lines

Re: Query on Peelable Mask on Immersion Tin finished PCBs

Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:12:30 -0700

165 lines

New Thread

Questions related to J-STD-001E

Questions related to J-STD-001E

Knapp, Wayne B <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:01:54 -0500

51 lines

Re: Questions related to J-STD-001E

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:40:02 -0500

83 lines

Re: Questions related to J-STD-001E

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:53:43 +0000

83 lines

Re: Questions related to J-STD-001E

Knapp, Wayne B <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:10:31 -0500

109 lines

Re: Questions related to J-STD-001E

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:59:13 -0400

145 lines

New Thread

Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:36:51 -0400

84 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:51:57 -0700

172 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:53:24 -0400

123 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:37:55 -0500

186 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:44:07 +0100

136 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:49:10 -0500

197 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:45:59 -0500

197 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:22:51 +0100

239 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Sharon Starr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:42:32 -0500

291 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:54 -0500

237 lines

Re: Remain competitive and help. Your opinion needed Terry B. Baker

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:20:19 -0400

250 lines

New Thread

Repair/Rework Standards

Repair/Rework Standards

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:11:28 -0400

35 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:56:38 -0500

104 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:25:11 -0400

154 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:37:07 -0400

214 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:48:33 -0500

32 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:51:31 -0500

228 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:57:13 -0700

67 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:59:34 -0400

305 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:01:06 -0400

109 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:04:50 -0500

313 lines

Re: Repair/Rework Standards

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:09:50 -0500

310 lines

New Thread

Resistor part numbers

Re: Resistor part numbers

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:00:07 -0600

89 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:07:08 -0600

258 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:16:58 -0400

130 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Harner, Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:52:37 -0700

341 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:17:55 -0600

367 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:42:50 -0400

407 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 06:50:38 -0500

175 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:51:07 -0400

112 lines

Re: Resistor part numbers

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 07:38:22 -0600

487 lines

New Thread

Response to Ahne

Re: Response to Ahne

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:59:23 -0400

145 lines

Re: Response to Ahne

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:03:14 -0400

230 lines

Re: Response to Ahne

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:15:36 -0400

192 lines

Re: Response to Ahne

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:03:21 -0700

233 lines

Re: Response to Ahne

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:08:52 -0400

197 lines

Re: Response to Ahne

Terry Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:34:16 -0400

107 lines

New Thread

Silkscreen

Silkscreen

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:27:23 -0400

54 lines

Re: Silkscreen

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:58:27 -0400

96 lines

New Thread

Software Comparison

Software Comparison

Vargas, Stephen M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:34:51 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Solderability of nickel plating

Solderability of nickel plating

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:52:39 -0400

118 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:14:25 -0500

187 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:24:07 +0000

129 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:25:03 -0400

165 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:38:21 -0400

182 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:51:29 +0000

152 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:28:12 -0500

235 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:40:20 -0400

323 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:22:01 -0400

222 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:30:23 +0100

255 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:37:07 -0400

278 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:36:21 -0500

252 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:54:40 -0400

317 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:00:23 -0400

331 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:02:02 +0100

351 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:48:53 -0500

329 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:29:43 -0700

289 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:36:21 -0400

320 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:42:47 -0400

332 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:55:54 -0500

339 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:12:28 -0500

363 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Bryon Boone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:14:41 -0400

409 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:38:32 +0000

380 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:12:11 +0200

379 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:17:15 -0400

461 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:58:22 +0200

441 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:09:13 -0400

514 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:48:32 +0200

482 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:54:03 -0400

503 lines

Re: Solderability of nickel plating

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:48:07 -0700

512 lines

New Thread

Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:13:11 -0700

74 lines

Re: Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:52:38 +0100

129 lines

Re: Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:02:56 -0400

112 lines

Re: Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:28:31 -0700

75 lines

Re: Soldering vs Storage/Operating Temperatures

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:35:23 -0400

129 lines

New Thread

Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:02:06 +0100

52 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:20:41 -0400

98 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:24:19 +0100

84 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:56:14 -0400

150 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:12:39 +0100

134 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:23:20 -0400

106 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Rick Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:05:42 -0500

152 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 05:59:44 -0500

190 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:24:18 +0000

65 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:48:35 -0700

317 lines

New Thread

Stencil thickness v solder paste height - Character set not allowed

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height - Character set not allowed

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:30:45 -0700

254 lines

Re: Stencil thickness v solder paste height - Character set not allowed

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:38:35 -0500

256 lines

New Thread

Steve Wozniak to headline IPC APEX EXPO 2011 - vote on his topic!

Steve Wozniak to headline IPC APEX EXPO 2011 - vote on his topic!

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:50:34 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Steve Wozniak Voting - third try

Steve Wozniak Voting - third try

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:11:14 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Steve Wozniak Voting Link

Steve Wozniak Voting Link

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:56:44 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Supplier Quality Response Engineer position

Supplier Quality Response Engineer position

Oscar Fallah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:20:40 -0700

174 lines

New Thread

Tin Whiskers elimination article

Tin Whiskers elimination article

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:56:06 -0700

51 lines

Re: Tin Whiskers elimination article

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:43:34 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

TNC-Cleaning No Clean Flux

Re: TNC-Cleaning No Clean Flux

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:30:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: TNC-Cleaning No Clean Flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:44:34 -0500

48 lines

Re: TNC-Cleaning No Clean Flux

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:19:54 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

Torque or Hand-Tighten Self Locking Nuts?

Torque or Hand-Tighten Self Locking Nuts?

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:23:23 -0700

59 lines

Re: Torque or Hand-Tighten Self Locking Nuts?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:31:04 -0400

114 lines

New Thread

Via fill quality

Via fill quality

Fabien Guizelin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:55:19 +0000

42 lines

Re: Via fill quality

jan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:31:15 +0800

80 lines

New Thread

Wave Temperature Overshoot

Wave Temperature Overshoot

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:41:21 +0100

67 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Richard D. Krug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:33:54 -0400

117 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Amol Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:36:58 -0400

123 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:29:51 -0700

235 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:10:17 +0000

303 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:18:14 +0100

336 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:49:12 -0700

398 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:54:18 +0000

452 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:15:32 -0700

463 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:11:02 -0700

514 lines

New Thread

Wave Temperature Overshoot - Mercury

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot - Mercury

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:26:53 +0000

558 lines

Re: Wave Temperature Overshoot - Mercury

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:45:24 -0700

371 lines

New Thread

Weight of water on board after rinse / blow off.

Weight of water on board after rinse / blow off.

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:54:24 -0400

78 lines

Re: Weight of water on board after rinse / blow off.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:31:41 -0500

122 lines

Re: Weight of water on board after rinse / blow off.

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:34:30 -0400

164 lines

New Thread

Wetting on the thermal pad of DPAKs

Wetting on the thermal pad of DPAKs

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:51:22 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:48:14 -0500

76 lines

Re: Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:22:01 -0400

126 lines

Re: Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:43:02 -0400

117 lines

Re: Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:07:29 -0400

155 lines

Re: Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:12:15 -0400

170 lines

Re: Where about of "Tom Clifford"

Ragesh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:19:36 +0530

33 lines

New Thread

[DC] Equal Signal Lengths on High Speed Designs

Re: [DC] Equal Signal Lengths on High Speed Designs

Barry Olney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:57:57 +1000

91 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager