LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2010 SMTAI Conference and Show (1 message)
40 Mhz Oscillator (3 messages)
40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue (5 messages)
Are open vias in underfill area a problem? (4 messages)
ATE Test fixtures (5 messages)
AW: [TN] Ideal Component Storage RH Levels (1 message)
Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression (11 messages)
Checking Board Cleaning (6 messages)
Cleaning for Hand Soldering (8 messages)
Cleanliness Testers (3 messages)
Colour of Oxidized Tin (5 messages)
Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB (4 messages)
contact cleaner- recommendation (23 messages)
Correction: Current Carrying Capability (2 messages)
Die cracks (24 messages)
Espanex Adhesiveless Laminate (2 messages)
FAA Certified Repair location (3 messages)
Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating (4 messages)
Flux Cleaning (5 messages)
FR-4 Mechanical Properties (2 messages)
FR-6 Laminate Supplier and Technical Datasheet (2 messages)
FW: [TN] Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to? (1 message)
Fwd: [TN] Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB (1 message)
GC Prevue? (1 message)
Gold plating - Aluminium (1 message)
Hackneyed? (13 messages)
Hackneyed? [NTC WARNING] (1 message)
Heads up on some technical programs savings (2 messages)
High Aspect ratio issues (10 messages)
Ideal Component Storage RH Levels (5 messages)
IMC (13 messages)
IMC growth on ImSn (7 messages)
Inspection Systems (13 messages)
Installation and operation manuals of AOI & X-ray machine SVX-2000 (1 message)
IPC-5702 / IPC-5704 (4 messages)
IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED (17 messages)
ITRI-NiAu (1 message)
Laser soldering of BGA (20 messages)
Lead forming services (2 messages)
LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION (7 messages)
Lead-free soldering on ImAg (17 messages)
NTC - Friday Quiz Question (8 messages)
NTC - Friday Quiz Question and the Answers (1 message)
NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive? (4 messages)
NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering (7 messages)
NTC [TN] Hackneyed? (1 message)
NTC [TN] IMC growth on ImSn (2 messages)
Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to? (18 messages)
Pace maker recall URL (17 messages)
Pace maker recall--beyond tin whiskers (1 message)
Pass Fail criteria for HATS tests (2 messages)
Pin cutting (1 message)
Pre-Tinned BGA? (15 messages)
Pre-Tinned BGA? - Found word(s) to be removed list error remove list risk free in the Text body (1 message)
pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via (22 messages)
R: [TN] Vapor Phase soldering (1 message)
Reading IPC-B-24 data issues (8 messages)
Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads (5 messages)
Rigid Flex Scoring (1 message)
Ring arround fiducial (2 messages)
Roger Wild References (1 message)
Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148) (5 messages)
So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle) (5 messages)
So long Roger, I'm in the same boat (1 message)
Source of solder mask coated FR4 (1 message)
Strange new component... (6 messages)
Suggestions on Making BGA Voids (14 messages)
Technet photo posting (1 message)
Technet Pictures (39 messages)
tin whisker videos (2 messages)
Tinning equipment (4 messages)
Tinning gold plated SMT connector (2 messages)
Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors (10 messages)
toe-down again, health (2 messages)
Touch up on ENIG (4 messages)
track lifting (26 messages)
Vapor Phase soldering (14 messages)
Vishay Tantamount CC (4 messages)
Wattado? (7 messages)
What is your favorite SMT adhesive. (1 message)
What kind of flex base materials to be used? Flex Circuit 2 layer which should operate on product at 200 C. (2 messages)
Your vote is needed - academic posters to be selected for display at IPC APEX EXPO - vote at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/academic-posters (2 messages)
[LF] Cooling rates (3 messages)
[LF] [TN] track lifting (1 message)
[spam] Responding to your e-mail - [TN] Source of solder mask coated FR4 (1 message)
[tinwhiskers] Tin Whiskers Threaten US Mint (humor) (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2010 SMTAI Conference and Show

2010 SMTAI Conference and Show

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:09:24 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

40 Mhz Oscillator

40 Mhz Oscillator

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:27:33 -0600

35 lines

Re: 40 Mhz Oscillator

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:58:06 -0500

82 lines

Re: 40 Mhz Oscillator

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:25:43 +0100

106 lines

New Thread

40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Re: 40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:28:15 -0600

141 lines

Re: 40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:09:09 +0200

122 lines

Re: 40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:35:07 +0100

157 lines

Re: 40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:26:07 +0100

196 lines

Re: 40 MHz Oscillator, plated metallization thickness issue

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:04:48 +0200

156 lines

New Thread

Are open vias in underfill area a problem?

Are open vias in underfill area a problem?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:22:06 -0800

36 lines

Re: Are open vias in underfill area a problem?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:37:26 -0600

91 lines

Re: Are open vias in underfill area a problem?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:42:34 -0500

68 lines

Re: Are open vias in underfill area a problem?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:47:35 -0800

99 lines

New Thread

ATE Test fixtures

ATE Test fixtures

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:31:06 -0500

36 lines

Re: ATE Test fixtures

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:39:46 -0500

66 lines

Re: ATE Test fixtures

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:16:08 -0500

78 lines

Re: ATE Test fixtures

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:29:42 -0500

90 lines

Re: ATE Test fixtures

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:46:00 -0800

111 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

AW: [TN] Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Jeremias, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:23:46 +0100

187 lines

New Thread

Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:34:14 -0800

59 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:46:49 -0500

105 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:52:19 -0600

97 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:24:59 -0500

49 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:55:53 -0800

52 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:44:16 -0500

90 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:20:00 -0800

106 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:43:50 -0500

124 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:00:28 -0500

52 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:05:38 -0800

101 lines

Re: Best way to measure "actual" themal pad compression

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:55:47 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

Checking Board Cleaning

Checking Board Cleaning

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:16:04 -0500

48 lines

Re: Checking Board Cleaning

Carroll, Thomas A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:36:50 -0800

106 lines

Re: Checking Board Cleaning

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:45:05 -0500

90 lines

Re: Checking Board Cleaning

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:54:09 -0500

141 lines

Re: Checking Board Cleaning

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:05:57 -0500

171 lines

Re: Checking Board Cleaning

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:51:01 -0600

85 lines

New Thread

Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Cleaning for Hand Soldering

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:29:59 -0800

44 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:07:39 -0500

95 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:20:09 -0600

125 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:31:34 -0600

101 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:50:57 -0500

154 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:08:16 -0600

217 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:38:51 +0000

142 lines

Re: Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:36:45 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Cleanliness Testers

Cleanliness Testers

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:03:08 -0800

35 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testers

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:47:33 -0800

81 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testers

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:36:34 -0500

136 lines

New Thread

Colour of Oxidized Tin

Colour of Oxidized Tin

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:28:01 -0500

51 lines

Re: Colour of Oxidized Tin

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:47:45 -0500

99 lines

Re: Colour of Oxidized Tin

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:15:54 -0600

104 lines

Re: Colour of Oxidized Tin

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:26:18 -0800

95 lines

Re: Colour of Oxidized Tin

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:56:46 -0800

125 lines

New Thread

Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:01:27 -0600

27 lines

Re: Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:09:29 -0600

55 lines

Re: Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:14:42 +0000

110 lines

Re: Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:22:30 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

contact cleaner- recommendation

contact cleaner- recommendation

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:29:17 +0800

27 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Harner, Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:10:50 -0800

85 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:46:53 +0800

116 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:35:06 +0200

51 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:56:54 -0500

115 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:22:33 -0500

152 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:32:07 -0600

147 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:55:28 -0800

145 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:24:58 -0500

191 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:40:46 -0600

254 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:27:31 -0500

226 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:49:01 -0500

241 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:56:54 -0600

265 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:03:50 -0500

284 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:36:14 -0500

297 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Harner, Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:41:52 -0800

360 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:32:23 -0500

386 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:05:52 -0600

289 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:22:22 -0600

350 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:33:22 -0600

386 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:15:43 -0500

283 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:56:26 +0000

195 lines

Re: contact cleaner- recommendation

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:55:31 +0000

155 lines

New Thread

Correction: Current Carrying Capability

Correction: Current Carrying Capability

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:02:14 -0600

101 lines

Re: Correction: Current Carrying Capability

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:13:28 -0500

132 lines

New Thread

Die cracks

Die cracks

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:44:45 -0500

55 lines

Re: Die cracks

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:56:56 -0500

115 lines

Re: Die cracks

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:09:29 -0500

98 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:45:01 -0600

164 lines

Re: Die cracks

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:47:47 -0600

101 lines

Re: Die cracks

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:54:55 -0700

131 lines

Re: Die cracks

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:07:27 -0500

148 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:08:05 -0600

132 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:09:22 -0600

87 lines

Re: Die cracks

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:17:52 -0500

50 lines

Re: Die cracks

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:36:07 -0500

197 lines

Re: Die cracks

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:59:13 -0500

88 lines

Re: Die cracks

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:00:32 +0000

165 lines

Re: Die cracks

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:14:37 +0000

61 lines

Re: Die cracks

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:16:07 -0500

120 lines

Re: Die cracks

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:16:19 -0800

162 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:27:35 -0600

228 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:28:58 -0600

118 lines

Re: Die cracks

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:35:06 +0000

102 lines

Re: Die cracks

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:36:50 -0500

249 lines

Re: Die cracks

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:53:18 -0600

152 lines

Re: Die cracks

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:08:40 +0100

152 lines

Re: Die cracks

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:59:12 -0500

196 lines

Re: Die cracks

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:19:05 -0800

271 lines

New Thread

Espanex Adhesiveless Laminate

Espanex Adhesiveless Laminate

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:58:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Espanex Adhesiveless Laminate

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:30:59 -0800

83 lines

New Thread

FAA Certified Repair location

FAA Certified Repair location

Luan Nguyen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:06:44 +0700

51 lines

Re: FAA Certified Repair location

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:58:34 -0600

79 lines

Re: FAA Certified Repair location

Marsal Tampubolon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:28:07 +0700

102 lines

New Thread

Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating

Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:41:34 -0600

34 lines

Re: Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:46:38 +0000

102 lines

Re: Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:27:04 -0600

96 lines

Re: Fluorescent Tracers in UV Conformal Coating

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:45:27 -0600

142 lines

New Thread

Flux Cleaning

Flux Cleaning

jonathan noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:46:55 +0800

40 lines

Re: Flux Cleaning

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:32:33 +0200

75 lines

Re: Flux Cleaning

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:32:25 +0100

115 lines

Re: Flux Cleaning

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:31:03 -0500

79 lines

Re: Flux Cleaning

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:55:51 +0000

91 lines

New Thread

FR-4 Mechanical Properties

FR-4 Mechanical Properties

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:04:32 -0800

35 lines

Re: FR-4 Mechanical Properties

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:59:46 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

FR-6 Laminate Supplier and Technical Datasheet

FR-6 Laminate Supplier and Technical Datasheet

Harris Dy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:50:57 -0800

34 lines

Re: FR-6 Laminate Supplier and Technical Datasheet

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:43:51 -0600

86 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

FW: [TN] Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:15:43 -0500

175 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [TN] Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

Fwd: [TN] Compliant Pin & 0.031 PCB

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:17:19 +0000

121 lines

New Thread

GC Prevue?

GC Prevue?

Braddock, Iain (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:19:11 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Gold plating - Aluminium

Gold plating - Aluminium

Pradeep Menon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:01:47 +0530

44 lines

New Thread

Hackneyed?

Hackneyed?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:53:35 -0800

86 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:22:37 -0500

147 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:43:47 -0600

205 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:14:41 -0600

216 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:59:19 +0000

156 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:04:31 +0100

268 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:08:51 +0100

172 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:10:08 +0000

189 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:00:28 -0500

177 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:39:17 -0500

217 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:01:09 -0500

187 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:01:08 -0500

203 lines

Re: Hackneyed?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:08:30 -0500

249 lines

New Thread

Hackneyed? [NTC WARNING]

Re: Hackneyed? [NTC WARNING]

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:10:47 -0500

256 lines

New Thread

Heads up on some technical programs savings

Re: Heads up on some technical programs savings

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:14:33 -0500

105 lines

Re: Heads up on some technical programs savings

Gayle Pervos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:34:28 -0600

114 lines

New Thread

High Aspect ratio issues

High Aspect ratio issues

Shanmugam, Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:21:11 +0530

42 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:33:18 -0500

87 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Shanmugam, Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:48:55 +0530

135 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:15:38 -0500

183 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:52:10 -0800

162 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:11:15 -0500

186 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:02:58 -0500

223 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:00:01 -0500

300 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:29:36 -0500

102 lines

Re: High Aspect ratio issues

Shanmugam, Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:58:53 +0530

139 lines

New Thread

Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:56:10 -0500

41 lines

Re: Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:33:45 -0600

91 lines

Re: Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:12:01 -0500

71 lines

Re: Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:29:39 -0500

114 lines

Re: Ideal Component Storage RH Levels

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:29:45 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

IMC

IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:50:03 -0500

34 lines

Re: IMC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:36:00 -0800

62 lines

Re: IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:46:04 -0500

91 lines

Re: IMC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:36:23 -0800

99 lines

Re: IMC

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:56:56 -0500

134 lines

Re: IMC

vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:17:04 +0000

75 lines

Re: IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:26:09 -0500

135 lines

Re: IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:30:05 -0500

174 lines

Re: IMC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:21:01 -0800

203 lines

Re: IMC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:27:41 -0800

208 lines

Re: IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:15:03 -0500

224 lines

Re: IMC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:45:50 -0800

245 lines

Re: IMC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:27:44 -0500

273 lines

New Thread

IMC growth on ImSn

IMC growth on ImSn

Iven, Jowan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:11:01 +0100

45 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:47:09 -0600

111 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

Iven, Jowan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:35:09 +0100

178 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:44:56 -0600

204 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:44:41 -0500

154 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:21:27 -0500

208 lines

Re: IMC growth on ImSn

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:28:04 -0600

218 lines

New Thread

Inspection Systems

Inspection Systems

Dacia Schoolfield <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:03:50 -0600

51 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:25:01 -0500

95 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:11:12 -0800

83 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:29:22 -0600

89 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:11:11 -0500

112 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Dean Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:47:23 -0600

155 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:51:00 -0500

31 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:23:13 -0500

136 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:13:09 -0500

158 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:08:44 -0700

147 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:59:21 -0800

168 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:19:30 -0500

207 lines

Re: Inspection Systems

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:47:14 +0000

124 lines

New Thread

Installation and operation manuals of AOI & X-ray machine SVX-2000

Re: Installation and operation manuals of AOI & X-ray machine SVX-2000

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:14:21 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

IPC-5702 / IPC-5704

IPC-5702 / IPC-5704

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:51:17 -0500

31 lines

Re: IPC-5702 / IPC-5704

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:00:05 -0600

94 lines

Re: IPC-5702 / IPC-5704

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:15:43 -0600

131 lines

Re: IPC-5702 / IPC-5704

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:21:50 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:07:02 -0500

37 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:19:13 -0800

92 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:20:13 -0500

127 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:46:45 -0800

179 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:49:52 -0500

154 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:57:58 -0800

216 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:03:01 -0500

187 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:31:02 -0500

227 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:34:41 -0600

197 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:40:46 -0600

237 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:47:56 -0500

86 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:04:20 -0800

294 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:37:25 -0800

152 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:48:43 +0000

332 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:05:35 +0000

191 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:33:34 +0000

154 lines

Re: IPC-7721 LESSONS LEARNED

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:00:30 -0500

201 lines

New Thread

ITRI-NiAu

ITRI-NiAu

An Gielen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:54:17 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Laser soldering of BGA

Laser soldering of BGA

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:34:49 -0500

51 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:49:54 -0500

93 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:52:34 -0500

87 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:07:00 -0500

114 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:21:20 -0800

175 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:21:18 -0600

142 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:29:59 -0500

199 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:31:18 -0600

209 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:42:11 -0800

145 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:42:30 -0500

267 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:58:01 -0600

289 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:21:02 -0500

48 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:41:56 -0600

77 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:52:46 +0000

100 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:07:29 -0600

163 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:23:39 -0500

119 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:24:55 -0500

187 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:30:54 -0500

226 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:18:41 -0600

263 lines

Re: Laser soldering of BGA

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:42:27 -0600

267 lines

New Thread

Lead forming services

Lead forming services

John Koleszar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:16:47 -0500

55 lines

Re: Lead forming services

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:39:51 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:45:45 -0600

51 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:08:57 -0500

62 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Harner, Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:12:56 -0800

108 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:36:54 -0600

138 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:03:14 -0500

150 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:58:29 -0600

283 lines

Re: LEAD TO HOLE RATIO QUESTION

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:03:01 -0500

294 lines

New Thread

Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:06:19 -0500

78 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:19:36 -0600

146 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:19:55 -0500

197 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:31:03 -0500

236 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:11:22 +0000

318 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Iven, Jowan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:00:39 +0100

367 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:22:29 -0500

412 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:21:43 +0000

395 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:55:24 -0500

82 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:06:24 -0500

125 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:08:33 -0500

146 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Iven, Jowan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:08:51 +0100

418 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:15:25 -0500

277 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Iven, Jowan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:13:54 +0100

503 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:59:01 -0800

514 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:23:43 -0600

279 lines

Re: Lead-free soldering on ImAg

Nigel Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:35:41 -0600

71 lines

New Thread

NTC - Friday Quiz Question

NTC - Friday Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:31:36 -0600

37 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:12:58 -0500

79 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:16:29 -0600

105 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:20:18 -0600

31 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:32:22 -0600

144 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:35:36 -0500

189 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:19:01 +0000

207 lines

Re: NTC - Friday Quiz Question

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:07:55 -0500

290 lines

New Thread

NTC - Friday Quiz Question and the Answers

NTC - Friday Quiz Question and the Answers

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:21:38 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive?

NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:46:25 -0500

90 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive?

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:50:33 -0600

58 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:54:02 -0700

123 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] What is your favorite adhesive?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:59:59 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:43:24 -0600

207 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:52:27 -0600

262 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:53:02 -0700

274 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:55:42 -0400

309 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:10:30 -0600

273 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:01:54 -0500

302 lines

Re: NTC [TN] Cleaning for Hand Soldering

Thomas E Kemp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:20:48 -0600

311 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] Hackneyed?

Re: NTC [TN] Hackneyed?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:09:10 -0500

244 lines

New Thread

NTC [TN] IMC growth on ImSn

Re: NTC [TN] IMC growth on ImSn

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:38:54 -0800

234 lines

Re: NTC [TN] IMC growth on ImSn

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:20:27 -0500

287 lines

New Thread

Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:42 -0400

42 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:53:42 -0800

90 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:02:48 -0400

121 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:20:56 -0600

93 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:39:38 -0400

125 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:41:54 -0500

124 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:23:58 -0600

98 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:38:34 -0500

152 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:45:36 -0500

151 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:32:27 -0600

189 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:06:12 -0500

63 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:37:42 +0000

271 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:55:12 -0500

188 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:19:24 -0600

135 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:30:49 -0600

197 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:44:57 +0000

101 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:13:39 +0000

213 lines

Re: Old reference for silver solder - what's it cross ref to?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:29:01 -0400

298 lines

New Thread

Pace maker recall URL

Pace maker recall URL

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:18:34 -0600

38 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:36:52 -0800

75 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:47:13 -0500

107 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:56:20 -0700

116 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:02:19 -0400

124 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Roberts, Jon (SA-1) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:16:39 -0600

132 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Brooks, Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:41:42 -0800

175 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:34:50 -0800

145 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:46:34 -0800

213 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Reliability Resources <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:59:50 -0800

255 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:40 -0500

383 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:07:38 -0500

420 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:15:25 -0600

474 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:20:19 -0500

458 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:22:23 -0500

445 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:53:46 -0500

461 lines

Re: Pace maker recall URL

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:34:10 -0500

480 lines

New Thread

Pace maker recall--beyond tin whiskers

Pace maker recall--beyond tin whiskers

Harvey Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:53:58 -0800

780 lines

New Thread

Pass Fail criteria for HATS tests

Pass Fail criteria for HATS tests

Zilber Gil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:12:38 +0200

52 lines

Re: Pass Fail criteria for HATS tests

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:38:01 -0500

111 lines

New Thread

Pin cutting

Re: Pin cutting

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:35:37 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

Pre-Tinned BGA?

Pre-Tinned BGA?

Carl Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:49:57 -0800

48 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:29:49 -0500

101 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:30:40 -0500

95 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:18:25 -0500

161 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:27:28 -0500

183 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:37:02 -0500

172 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:51:11 -0500

258 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Dave He <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:43:18 -0800

222 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:50:06 -0500

275 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:17:49 +0100

265 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:21:20 -0500

375 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:48:35 +0100

651 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:51:08 -0600

684 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:46:35 -0500

695 lines

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:22:35 -0500

675 lines

New Thread

Pre-Tinned BGA? - Found word(s) to be removed list error remove list risk free in the Text body

Re: Pre-Tinned BGA? - Found word(s) to be removed list error remove list risk free in the Text body

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:31:06 -0800

325 lines

New Thread

pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Shanmugam, Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:58:37 +0530

43 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:22:39 -0500

89 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:30:24 -0500

110 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:58:18 -0600

140 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:50:13 -0500

185 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:39:30 -0500

152 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:04:21 -0800

140 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Mickey Weiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:32:43 +0200

145 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:06:38 +0800

203 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Stephen Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:25:15 -0800

82 lines

pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Shanmugam, Nagaraj <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:09:13 +0530

140 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:43:47 -0500

81 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Michel Arbour <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:07:07 -0600

24 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:36:51 +0800

195 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:15 -0500

182 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:19:15 -0500

184 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:25:02 -0500

216 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:25:15 -0500

252 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:26:42 -0500

244 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:26:30 -0500

68 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Wang, Huey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:40:38 -0800

227 lines

Re: pros & cons of going for HDI Staggered & Stacked via

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:10:55 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

R: [TN] Vapor Phase soldering

R: [TN] Vapor Phase soldering

Gabriele Sala <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:51:48 +0100

168 lines

New Thread

Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:23:51 -0500

56 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:36:13 -0500

107 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Walt Manchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:39:18 -0500

95 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:17:52 -0600

127 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:53:42 -0800

97 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:53:50 -0500

151 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:00:12 -0500

154 lines

Re: Reading IPC-B-24 data issues

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:28:35 -0600

211 lines

New Thread

Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

Harner, Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:14:23 -0800

76 lines

Re: Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:59:40 -0500

111 lines

Re: Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:02:25 -0600

131 lines

Re: Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:50:15 -0600

29 lines

Re: Removal of Solder Mask from CU pads

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:08:50 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Rigid Flex Scoring

Rigid Flex Scoring

Paul Tome <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:24:55 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Ring arround fiducial

Ring arround fiducial

Ashok Dhawan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:37:51 -0600

41 lines

Re: Ring arround fiducial

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:43:08 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Roger Wild References

Roger Wild References

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:07:43 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

Re: Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:07:42 -0500

93 lines

Re: Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:47:10 -0500

37 lines

Re: Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:49:21 -0500

120 lines

Re: Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:09:05 -0600

165 lines

Re: Rough surface of glass diode (Fairchild 1N4148)

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:25:33 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:30:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:31:29 -0600

26 lines

Re: So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:07:41 +0000

119 lines

Re: So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:19:02 -0500

73 lines

Re: So long for now... (sniffle, sniffle)

Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:10:06 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

So long Roger, I'm in the same boat

Re: So long Roger, I'm in the same boat

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:12:30 +0000

119 lines

New Thread

Source of solder mask coated FR4

Source of solder mask coated FR4

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:17:11 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Strange new component...

Strange new component...

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:12:21 -0500

40 lines

Re: Strange new component...

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:32:27 -0800

73 lines

Re: Strange new component...

Thayer, Wayne - IIW <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:47:31 -0500

87 lines

Re: Strange new component...

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:14:00 -0600

83 lines

Re: Strange new component...

Don McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:10:42 -0700

131 lines

Re: Strange new component...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:07:21 -0500

118 lines

New Thread

Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:57 -0600

60 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:57:14 -0800

88 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:59:03 -0500

98 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:00:20 -0500

65 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:04:47 -0500

44 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Zilber Gil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:07:04 +0200

116 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:13:33 -0500

126 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:21:55 -0500

152 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:19 -0500

33 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:45:43 +0000

115 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:57:09 -0500

124 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:59:52 +0800

113 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:07:45 -0800

159 lines

Re: Suggestions on Making BGA Voids

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:58:34 +0000

119 lines

New Thread

Technet photo posting

Technet photo posting

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:52:34 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Technet Pictures

Technet Pictures

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:07:59 -0600

58 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Kenneth Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:13:03 -0500

83 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:28:48 -0500

116 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:29:16 -0500

109 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:34 -0500

86 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Kenneth Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:30:56 -0500

140 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:42:59 -0500

55 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:44:51 +0200

75 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:55:14 +0000

110 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:56:47 -0600

38 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:57:34 +0000

108 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:08:20 -0500

174 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:10:25 -0500

108 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:10:40 -0500

46 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Stephen Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:12:14 -0800

38 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:16:23 -0500

144 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:28:33 -0500

135 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:31:36 -0500

56 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:32:53 -0500

201 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:33:53 -0500

192 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:11:38 -0800

199 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:31:56 +0000

183 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:38:37 -0500

205 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:39:58 -0500

242 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:41:40 -0500

233 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:46:31 -0600

80 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:53:13 -0500

103 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:02:58 -0600

99 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:07:37 -0800

79 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:36:55 -0600

126 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:59:39 -0600

85 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:11:03 -0600

93 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:14:30 -0600

127 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:30:53 -0500

181 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:58:55 -0600

40 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:49:42 +0000

161 lines

Re: Technet Pictures

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:54:37 -0600

186 lines

Re: TechNet Pictures

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:57:29 -0600

104 lines

Re: TechNet Pictures

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:22:07 -0600

170 lines

New Thread

tin whisker videos

tin whisker videos

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:26:53 -0500

50 lines

Re: tin whisker videos

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:14:00 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Tinning equipment

Tinning equipment

Jack Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:36:02 -0600

42 lines

Re: Tinning equipment

Dean Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:45:29 -0600

93 lines

Re: Tinning equipment

Jack Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:34:54 -0600

41 lines

Re: Tinning equipment

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:55:06 +0000

109 lines

New Thread

Tinning gold plated SMT connector

Re: Tinning gold plated SMT connector

Dave He <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:44:05 -0800

191 lines

Re: Tinning gold plated SMT connector

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:15:28 -0500

218 lines

New Thread

Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Dave He <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:18:38 -0800

34 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:57:36 -0800

46 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:16:26 -0800

66 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:34:13 -0500

81 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Dave He <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:53:35 -0800

116 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Dean Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:24:44 -0600

173 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:58:47 -0500

221 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:34:15 -0500

272 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:34:12 -0500

272 lines

Re: Tinning gold-plated solder cup of connectors

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:46:07 -0600

294 lines

New Thread

toe-down again, health

Re: toe-down again, health

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:34:26 +0000

208 lines

Re: toe-down again, health

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:49:19 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Touch up on ENIG

Touch up on ENIG

Brown, Elaine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:19:01 -0500

43 lines

Re: Touch up on ENIG

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:18:30 -0800

88 lines

Re: Touch up on ENIG

Joel Robbins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:53:55 -0600

43 lines

Re: Touch up on ENIG

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:09:27 -0800

82 lines

New Thread

track lifting

track lifting

pearl petras <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:13:27 -0800

29 lines

Re: track lifting

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:10:51 -0500

70 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:11:45 -0500

114 lines

Re: track lifting

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:49:19 -0500

157 lines

Re: track lifting

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:25:57 -0500

152 lines

Re: track lifting

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:40:35 -0500

130 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:44:57 -0500

76 lines

Re: track lifting

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:43:44 -0800

108 lines

Re: track lifting

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:44:57 -0800

96 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:47:27 -0500

151 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:47:29 -0500

144 lines

Re: track lifting

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:55:46 -0600

96 lines

Re: track lifting

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:28:19 -0600

24 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:12:34 -0500

66 lines

Re: track lifting

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:33:23 -0600

71 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:40:54 -0500

148 lines

Re: track lifting

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:57:04 -0500

58 lines

Re: track lifting

pearl petras <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:26:20 -0800

113 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:59:09 -0500

118 lines

Re: track lifting

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:46:54 -0800

121 lines

Re: track lifting

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:13:29 -0500

95 lines

Re: track lifting

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:12:32 -0500

157 lines

Re: track lifting

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:27:31 -0500

196 lines

Re: track lifting

pearl petras <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:47:24 -0800

174 lines

Re: track lifting

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:37:28 -0500

215 lines

Re: track lifting

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:45:20 -0500

266 lines

New Thread

Vapor Phase soldering

Vapor Phase soldering

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:48:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:38:37 -0500

101 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:51:32 -0500

138 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:17:48 -0800

176 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:45:16 +0000

74 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:43:13 -0500

145 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:08:49 -0500

199 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:12:53 -0500

738 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 01:22:09 -0500

785 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:14:52 -0800

106 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Bob Landman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:13:39 -0500

874 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:26:35 -0500

818 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:37:22 -0500

854 lines

Re: Vapor Phase soldering

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:39:00 -0500

158 lines

New Thread

Vishay Tantamount CC

Vishay Tantamount CC

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:45:43 -0500

38 lines

Re: Vishay Tantamount CC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:14:28 -0500

82 lines

Re: Vishay Tantamount CC

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:33:25 -0500

72 lines

Re: Vishay Tantamount CC

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:48:07 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

Wattado?

Wattado?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:51:46 +0100

30 lines

Re: Wattado?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:28:00 -0500

65 lines

Re: Wattado?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:30:06 +0100

75 lines

Re: Wattado?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:50:40 -0800

106 lines

Re: Wattado?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:00:06 -0500

126 lines

Re: Wattado?

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:51:24 -0500

79 lines

Re: Wattado?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:07:01 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

What is your favorite SMT adhesive.

What is your favorite SMT adhesive.

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:43:04 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

What kind of flex base materials to be used? Flex Circuit 2 layer which should operate on product at 200 C.

What kind of flex base materials to be used? Flex Circuit 2 layer which should operate on product at 200 C.

Irena Sumanteva <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:17:46 +0000

51 lines

Re: What kind of flex base materials to be used? Flex Circuit 2 layer which should operate on product at 200 C.

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:53:05 +0000

96 lines

New Thread

Your vote is needed - academic posters to be selected for display at IPC APEX EXPO - vote at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/academic-posters

Re: Your vote is needed - academic posters to be selected for display at IPC APEX EXPO - vote at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/academic-posters

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:03:00 +0000

74 lines

Re: Your vote is needed - academic posters to be selected for display at IPC APEX EXPO - vote at www.IPCAPEXEXPO.org/academic-posters

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:12:41 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

[LF] Cooling rates

Re: [LF] Cooling rates

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 03:52:21 -0500

94 lines

Re: [LF] Cooling rates

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:10:27 +0100

115 lines

Re: [LF] Cooling rates

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:26:47 -0500

172 lines

New Thread

[LF] [TN] track lifting

Re: [LF] [TN] track lifting

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:57:17 -0500

187 lines

New Thread

[spam] Responding to your e-mail - [TN] Source of solder mask coated FR4

[spam] Responding to your e-mail - [TN] Source of solder mask coated FR4

SolderMask <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:28:23 -0800

75 lines

New Thread

[tinwhiskers] Tin Whiskers Threaten US Mint (humor)

Re: [tinwhiskers] Tin Whiskers Threaten US Mint (humor)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:07:30 -0800

113 lines

Re: [tinwhiskers] Tin Whiskers Threaten US Mint (humor)

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:19:42 -0500

149 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager