LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


April 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

Actel QFN180 Assembly (6 messages)
Another Bev survey (1 message)
Bad resistors (4 messages)
Cable assembly (4 messages)
Cable Shield (4 messages)
Cable Shielding (4 messages)
CAM position (1 message)
Chemical resistance ENIG (1 message)
Component stacking (5 messages)
computer questioin (11 messages)
Copper conductors (7 messages)
Copper repair (2 messages)
Decoupling Performance Class and Quality Assurance testing? (3 messages)
Determining Root Cause (13 messages)
Do we have a UL R/C PWB? (4 messages)
DYMAX ADHESIVES (1 message)
Edge connector repair (6 messages)
Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG) (9 messages)
European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive) (5 messages)
European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) (13 messages)
European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC (12 messages)
Friday Theorizing (14 messages)
FW: IPC 6013B (2 messages)
FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors (5 messages)
FW: Video: Surprise fun in Antwerp train station (3 messages)
FW: [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid? (1 message)
Fw: [TN] Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb (1 message)
General requirements for Radiation Equipment (3 messages)
GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR (4 messages)
Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid? (60 messages)
Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly (39 messages)
Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly NTC (1 message)
Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb (2 messages)
Implementing Class 3 assembly processes (6 messages)
Info on dry-film tenting of vias, both sides (1 message)
Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides (8 messages)
Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse (4 messages)
Interesting test regime for handsets (3 messages)
IPC APEX/EXPO (1 message)
IPC-A-610 Flux Residues 10.4.1 (2 messages)
IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing (6 messages)
LGA acceptance (2 messages)
LGAs in a military environment? (34 messages)
Mystery Connector (7 messages)
New technique------USB 3.0 (1 message)
Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200 (2 messages)
Nitrogen use for selective soldering equipment (3 messages)
NPTH or PTH? (3 messages)
NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid? (13 messages)
NTC GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR (1 message)
NTC RE: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR (2 messages)
NTC RE: [TN] Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly (1 message)
NTC: Some good news for someone finally! (4 messages)
NTC? SI vs imperial, cont. (5 messages)
OSP damage (2 messages)
PCB Failure analysis (9 messages)
Plating on screws (18 messages)
Plating over metal (5 messages)
Pre-printed shrink tubing (2 messages)
PTF Technology (2 messages)
Roll-to-Roll Research (11 messages)
Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA (4 messages)
Solder Ball Problem (9 messages)
solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal envi ronment (1 message)
solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment (10 messages)
Solder Paste In the Solder Pot (11 messages)
Solderability fluxes (1 message)
Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive (11 messages)
STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS (7 messages)
Stencil Life (3 messages)
Straddle mount connector at SMT (5 messages)
Test (1 message)
TH lead forming machines (6 messages)
The effects of vibration on SMT part overhang (3 messages)
threaded fastener selection guide (7 messages)
Traces and vias under components (1 message)
when do vias require a thermal relief (7 messages)
Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs (5 messages)
Zinc Plating and whiskers (2 messages)
[DC] when do vias require a thermal relief (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

Actel QFN180 Assembly

Actel QFN180 Assembly

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:10:54 -0500

39 lines

Re: Actel QFN180 Assembly

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:31:32 -0500

88 lines

Re: Actel QFN180 Assembly

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:11:30 -0500

125 lines

Re: Actel QFN180 Assembly

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:07:52 +0800

158 lines

Re: Actel QFN180 Assembly

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:17:17 -0700

187 lines

Re: Actel QFN180 Assembly

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:37:29 -0400

170 lines

New Thread

Another Bev survey

Another Bev survey

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:23:55 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Bad resistors

Bad resistors

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:54:15 -0400

42 lines

Re: Bad resistors

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:10:35 +0000

87 lines

Re: Bad resistors

Jim Carlson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:26:17 -0500

83 lines

Re: Bad resistors

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:31:21 -0400

139 lines

New Thread

Cable assembly

Re: Cable assembly

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:42:50 +0800

34 lines

Re: Cable assembly

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:58:38 +0200

61 lines

Re: Cable assembly

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:08:39 +0800

78 lines

Re: Cable assembly

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:19:48 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

Cable Shield

Cable Shield

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:57:19 -0500

33 lines

Re: Cable Shield

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:41:44 -0700

64 lines

Re: Cable Shield

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:47:41 -0500

78 lines

Re: Cable Shield

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:06:14 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

Cable Shielding

Cable Shielding

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:12:16 -0500

55 lines

Re: Cable Shielding

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:26:23 -0500

86 lines

Re: Cable Shielding

Douglas Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:47:14 -0700

117 lines

Re: Cable Shielding

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:13:15 +0200

120 lines

New Thread

CAM position

CAM position

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:39:55 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Chemical resistance ENIG

Chemical resistance ENIG

Anil kher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:07:10 +0530

56 lines

New Thread

Component stacking

Component stacking

Cindy S. Bohler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:35:07 -0500

28 lines

Re: Component stacking

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:40:03 -0400

64 lines

Re: Component stacking

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:48:25 +0000

58 lines

Re: Component stacking

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:17:45 -0400

55 lines

Re: Component stacking

?? <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:54 +0800

53 lines

New Thread

computer questioin

computer questioin

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:26:37 +0200

25 lines

Re: computer questioin

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:34:15 +0200

48 lines

Re: computer questioin

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:49:43 -0700

67 lines

Re: computer questioin

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:01:52 -0500

91 lines

Re: computer questioin

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:05:08 +0200

45 lines

Re: computer questioin

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:38:32 +0200

112 lines

Re: computer questioin

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:55:03 +0200

72 lines

Re: computer questioin

李义 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:37:32 +0800

112 lines

Re: computer questioin

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:50:16 +0200

118 lines

Re: computer questioin

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:32:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: computer questioin

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:43:36 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Copper conductors

Copper conductors

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:13:33 +0300

43 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:15:46 -0400

88 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:29:20 -0400

114 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:52:20 -0500

36 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:35:51 -0500

37 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:27:54 -0700

61 lines

Re: Copper conductors

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:36:02 -0500

91 lines

New Thread

Copper repair

Copper repair

Rolfe, David <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:17:36 -0400

38 lines

Re: Copper repair

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:21:00 -0400

80 lines

New Thread

Decoupling Performance Class and Quality Assurance testing?

Decoupling Performance Class and Quality Assurance testing?

David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:16:55 -0500

54 lines

Re: Decoupling Performance Class and Quality Assurance testing?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:37:47 -0500

63 lines

Re: Decoupling Performance Class and Quality Assurance testing?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:44:23 -0400

122 lines

New Thread

Determining Root Cause

Determining Root Cause

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:59:35 -0700

42 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:07:49 -0500

78 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:09:54 -0400

90 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:14:27 -0700

76 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:22:56 -0700

106 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:26:48 -0500

97 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:28:49 -0500

131 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:40:25 -0500

85 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Marsal Tampubolon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:45:34 +0700

93 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:30:23 -0400

104 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Dean Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:26:18 -0500

153 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:01:41 -0400

174 lines

Re: Determining Root Cause

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:35:12 -0700

74 lines

New Thread

Do we have a UL R/C PWB?

Do we have a UL R/C PWB?

Lenny Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:53:34 -0400

36 lines

Re: Do we have a UL R/C PWB?

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:59:30 -0500

66 lines

Re: Do we have a UL R/C PWB?

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:45:57 -0400

61 lines

Re: Do we have a UL R/C PWB?

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:16:29 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

DYMAX ADHESIVES

DYMAX ADHESIVES

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:47:32 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Edge connector repair

Edge connector repair

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:38:46 -0500

51 lines

Re: Edge connector repair

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:43:58 -0400

96 lines

Re: Edge connector repair

Peter Vigneau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:04:46 -0400

99 lines

Re: Edge connector repair

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:07:28 -0400

95 lines

Re: Edge connector repair

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:58:42 -0500

169 lines

Re: Edge connector repair

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:06:44 +0000

99 lines

New Thread

Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:11:01 -0400

37 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:49:52 -0400

66 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:51:51 -0400

106 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:52:08 -0500

133 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:40:39 -0500

87 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:59:23 -0400

75 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:08:47 +0100

137 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:06:04 -0700

70 lines

Re: Electroless Nickel Electroless Palladium Immersion Gold (ENEPIG)

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:22:08 EDT

51 lines

New Thread

European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:46:04 -0800

43 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:52:54 -0500

75 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:03:35 -0400

105 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:10:35 -0300

140 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Dire ctive)

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:20:15 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:20:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:22:10 -0700

65 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:01:03 -0500

95 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:35:56 -0700

118 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:16:20 +0100

180 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:43:18 -0700

127 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:50:40 -0500

143 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:51:41 EDT

47 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:09:25 -0500

101 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:23:42 -0400

226 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:16:34 +0300

269 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:35:57 +0300

329 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:42:33 +0300

396 lines

New Thread

European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:54:59 -0400

45 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:02:52 EDT

85 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:00:50 -0400

123 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:19:57 +0200

152 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:54:06 EDT

240 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:10:07 -0400

221 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:30:38 -0400

50 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:39:13 -0400

323 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:54:08 +0200

79 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:59:55 +0200

219 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:06:03 -0400

358 lines

Re: European Union Council Directive 80/181/EEC (Metric Directive) - NTC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:28:51 +0200

258 lines

New Thread

Friday Theorizing

Friday Theorizing

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:17:08 -0700

29 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:01:51 +0200

74 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:48 -0400

80 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:15:28 +0200

102 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:08:15 -0700

106 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:41:49 -0500

187 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:07:23 +0200

174 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:05:43 -0700

64 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:14:44 -0400

101 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Richard Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:58:26 -0500

31 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:16:13 -0700

61 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:19:13 +0200

128 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:25:33 -0400

152 lines

Re: Friday Theorizing

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:01:04 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

FW: IPC 6013B

FW: IPC 6013B

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:10:11 -0400

67 lines

Re: FW: IPC 6013B

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:19:12 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

James Liddle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:01:00 +0000

44 lines

Re: FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:22:45 -0500

117 lines

Re: FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:35:33 -0700

108 lines

Re: FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:32:17 -0400

183 lines

Re: FW: Lead Free Reworking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:09:04 -0500

222 lines

New Thread

FW: Video: Surprise fun in Antwerp train station

FW: Video: Surprise fun in Antwerp train station

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:23:43 -0400

27 lines

Re: FW: Video: Surprise fun in Antwerp train station

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:51:15 -0700

30 lines

Re: FW: Video: Surprise fun in Antwerp train station

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:00:30 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

FW: [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:44:43 -0500

356 lines

New Thread

Fw: [TN] Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb

Fw: [TN] Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb

Selva Suganthi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:40:37 +0530

80 lines

New Thread

General requirements for Radiation Equipment

General requirements for Radiation Equipment

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:02:03 -0500

119 lines

Re: General requirements for Radiation Equipment

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:51 -0700

169 lines

Re: General requirements for Radiation Equipment

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:12:50 -0500

214 lines

New Thread

GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:03:21 -0500

29 lines

Re: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:24:37 -0500

60 lines

Re: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:37:01 +0100

69 lines

Re: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:42:09 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:55:52 +0200

35 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:07:36 +0000

50 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:15:23 +0200

94 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:18:15 -0400

74 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:27:38 +0200

100 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:41:00 -0400

96 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:55:36 +0000

67 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:36:01 +0000

118 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:42:04 +0200

183 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:37:31 -0400

224 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:44:47 +0000

170 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:48:44 -0500

275 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:51:17 -0500

275 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:58:27 -0400

191 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:07:11 -0400

331 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:17:24 +0000

193 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:58:36 -0500

49 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:02:44 -0700

327 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:26:52 -0400

77 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:11:09 -0400

303 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:19:59 -0400

274 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:29:08 +0000

202 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:45:28 -0400

342 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:01:43 -0500

375 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:16:03 -0500

444 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:36:21 -0400

415 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:41:24 +0000

234 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:55:47 -0700

427 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:19:34 -0400

443 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:37:08 +0000

272 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:42:24 +0200

443 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:43:43 -0500

500 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:52:13 +0200

494 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:54:00 -0400

538 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:13:39 +0000

320 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:49:03 -0500

525 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:03:05 +0000

310 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:07:19 -0400

533 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:13:36 -0400

558 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:15:43 +0000

301 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:22:08 +0000

336 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:21:09 -0400

611 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:23:18 -0500

605 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:23:58 -0400

494 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:26:34 -0400

575 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:33:28 -0400

38 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:33:47 EDT

26 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:11:16 -0400

79 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:29:59 -0400

110 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:31:10 -0400

93 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:33:35 -0400

151 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:44:58 -0400

208 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:53:03 -0500

265 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:21:16 -0400

179 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:31:59 -0500

123 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:44:52 -0500

190 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:48:50 -0400

168 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:37:16 -0400

203 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:01:34 -0400

150 lines

Re: Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:27:36 -0400

286 lines

New Thread

Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Carl Proescholdt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:22:19 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:42:57 -0400

73 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:06:42 +0300

136 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:21:39 -0700

162 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:58:30 -0400

139 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:14:44 -0800

63 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:52:21 -0700

267 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:58:12 +0100

74 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:50 -0500

148 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:13:02 -0300

305 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:15:24 -0700

304 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:46:03 -0400

300 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:49:02 -0400

121 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Randall L Bock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:54:22 -0400

164 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:22:04 -0700

326 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:02:59 -0700

361 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:18:27 -0400

168 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:19:32 +0300

150 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:41:56 -0400

220 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:01:47 -0400

255 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:14:55 -0500

304 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:11:02 -0500

59 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:25:36 -0700

291 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:53:31 -0700

389 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:05:52 +0300

105 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:06:57 -0800

49 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:17:56 -0700

402 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:25:56 -0500

100 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:29:07 -0500

212 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:29:42 +0300

118 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:48:27 EDT

147 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:50:10 -0400

191 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:58:13 -0400

345 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:09:43 -0400

221 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:54:39 -0500

78 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:55:48 -0500

1525 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:30 +0100

129 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:25:21 -0500

163 lines

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:36:52 -0700

191 lines

New Thread

Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly NTC

Re: Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:56:30 EDT

272 lines

New Thread

Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb

Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb

Selva Suganthi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:34:08 +0530

45 lines

Re: Help me - NC pin without pad on the pcb

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:23:14 -0400

96 lines

New Thread

Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Rios Edward-QDMB76 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:48:49 -0400

32 lines

Re: Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:07:25 -0400

77 lines

Re: Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:21:51 +0800

102 lines

Re: Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Grunde Gjertsen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:46:30 +0200

91 lines

Re: Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:47:11 -0400

79 lines

Re: Implementing Class 3 assembly processes

Rios Edward-QDMB76 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:34:47 -0400

136 lines

New Thread

Info on dry-film tenting of vias, both sides

Re: Info on dry-film tenting of vias, both sides

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:18:24 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:44:56 -0400

43 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:49:55 -0700

77 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:25:10 -0400

76 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:44:43 -0400

107 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:55:39 -0700

150 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:32:26 -0400

149 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:15:04 -0400

206 lines

Re: Info on LPI tenting of vias, both sides

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:10:35 -0700

263 lines

New Thread

Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse

Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:01:48 -0400

37 lines

Re: Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:17:19 -0400

73 lines

Re: Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:07:52 -0400

77 lines

Re: Info PCB Design for High Current / Short Duration Pulse

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:07:14 -0400

90 lines

New Thread

Interesting test regime for handsets

Interesting test regime for handsets

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:45:44 EDT

25 lines

Re: Interesting test regime for handsets

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:40:58 -0400

57 lines

Re: Interesting test regime for handsets

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:51:07 EDT

38 lines

New Thread

IPC APEX/EXPO

IPC APEX/EXPO

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:05:21 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

IPC-A-610 Flux Residues 10.4.1

IPC-A-610 Flux Residues 10.4.1

Carrillo, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:59:38 -0400

43 lines

Re: IPC-A-610 Flux Residues 10.4.1

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:58:08 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:37:07 -0400

55 lines

Re: IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:02:44 -0400

157 lines

Re: IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:45:25 -0400

114 lines

Re: IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:11:52 -0500

242 lines

Re: IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:30:32 +0100

239 lines

Re: IPC/EIA-J-STD 002 Steam Ageing

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:18:57 -0400

277 lines

New Thread

LGA acceptance

Re: LGA acceptance

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:50:31 +0200

91 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:01:02 -0400

206 lines

New Thread

LGAs in a military environment?

LGAs in a military environment?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:32:15 -0300

35 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:05:14 -0400

72 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:15:54 -0500

66 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:21:56 -0700

68 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Post, Scott E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:27:34 -0400

133 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:39:52 -0400

96 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:02:46 -0500

141 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:29:15 -0700

126 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:47:07 -0400

162 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:57:44 -0400

174 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:05:31 -0400

208 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:10:08 -0400

154 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:11:02 -0500

208 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:25:04 -0400

51 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:29:43 -0400

98 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:32:00 -0400

193 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:33:18 -0400

101 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:42:35 -0400

100 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:47:33 +0100

166 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:57:08 -0400

127 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:11:51 -0700

106 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:23:04 -0400

135 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:44:15 -0400

91 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:51:40 -0400

135 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:32:34 -0400

146 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:31:28 -0700

151 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:44:46 -0300

194 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:52:17 -0700

211 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:06:51 -0500

255 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:08:26 -0500

125 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:31:14 -0400

179 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:48:00 -0700

255 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:50:16 +0200

74 lines

Re: LGAs in a military environment?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:32:36 -0400

125 lines

New Thread

Mystery Connector

Mystery Connector

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:17:31 -0500

41 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Douglas Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:10:58 -0700

81 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:11:27 -0400

89 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Douglas Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:19:49 -0700

85 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:54:28 -0500

82 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:26:44 -0500

26 lines

Re: Mystery Connector

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:02:42 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

New technique------USB 3.0

New technique------USB 3.0

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:29:50 +0800

29 lines

New Thread

Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Lee Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:29:20 -0400

159 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:50:17 +0200

189 lines

New Thread

Nitrogen use for selective soldering equipment

Nitrogen use for selective soldering equipment

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: Nitrogen use for selective soldering equipment

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:02:14 +0200

51 lines

Re: Nitrogen use for selective soldering equipment

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:41:16 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

NPTH or PTH?

NPTH or PTH?

李义 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:07:30 +0800

29 lines

Re: NPTH or PTH?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:10:42 -0400

52 lines

Re: NPTH or PTH?

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:56:06 -0400

108 lines

New Thread

NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:53:04 -0500

212 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:20:52 -0400

245 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:20:57 -0500

260 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:25:37 -0500

286 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:50:44 -0700

250 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:20:34 -0400

343 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:31:13 -0500

333 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:07:28 -0400

165 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:51:57 +0200

291 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:35:41 -0400

590 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:07:26 -0500

330 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:16:02 -0700

378 lines

Re: NTC - [TN] Gold/Tin Intermetallics, why are we afraid?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:37:56 +0300

325 lines

New Thread

NTC GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Re: NTC GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:28:58 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

NTC RE: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:07:30 -0500

43 lines

Re: NTC RE: GM & Chrysler Out of NASCAR

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:23:05 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

NTC RE: [TN] Hand Sanitizer and PCB Assembly

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:54:04 -0400

288 lines

New Thread

NTC: Some good news for someone finally!

NTC: Some good news for someone finally!

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:57:38 -0500

46 lines

Re: NTC: Some good news for someone finally!

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:38:23 -0400

82 lines

Re: NTC: Some good news for someone finally!

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:54:26 -0700

99 lines

Re: NTC: Some good news for someone finally!

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:26:07 -0700

120 lines

New Thread

NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:06:36 -0400

95 lines

Re: NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:29:54 +0100

135 lines

Re: NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:00:53 EDT

197 lines

Re: NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:05:11 -0400

226 lines

Re: NTC? SI vs imperial, cont.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:21:31 EDT

263 lines

New Thread

OSP damage

OSP damage

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:33:11 -0400

38 lines

Re: OSP damage

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:57:32 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

PCB Failure analysis

PCB Failure analysis

mp3 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:57 +0530

32 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:41:41 -0700

78 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:43:53 -0700

66 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:57:21 -0400

105 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:45:06 -0400

96 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Karnwal, Pankaj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:18:23 +0530

152 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:23:03 -0700

179 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

mp3 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:59:02 +0530

165 lines

Re: PCB Failure analysis

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:33:15 -0400

254 lines

New Thread

Plating on screws

Plating on screws

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:09:11 -0500

44 lines

Re: Plating on screws

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:05:47 -0500

91 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:20:46 -0400

120 lines

Re: Plating on screws

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:38:23 -0700

75 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:16 -0500

132 lines

Re: Plating on screws

EIMCNews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:44:40 -0700

48 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:54:28 -0500

87 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:05:19 -0500

86 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:29:19 -0400

82 lines

Re: Plating on screws

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:17:22 -0500

76 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:20:30 -0400

96 lines

Re: Plating on screws

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:30:07 -0500

138 lines

Re: Plating on screws

EIMCNews <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:28:28 -0700

32 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:34:09 -0400

58 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:45:06 -0700

95 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:27:14 -0700

133 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:34:43 -0400

40 lines

Re: Plating on screws

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:51:20 -0400

158 lines

New Thread

Plating over metal

Plating over metal

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:22:59 -0400

40 lines

Re: Plating over metal

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:28:26 -0500

69 lines

Re: Plating over metal

David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:28:31 -0500

84 lines

Re: Plating over metal

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:28:37 -0400

74 lines

Re: Plating over metal

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:29:48 -0400

143 lines

New Thread

Pre-printed shrink tubing

Pre-printed shrink tubing

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:02:58 -0400

76 lines

Re: Pre-printed shrink tubing

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:40:20 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

PTF Technology

PTF Technology

Harris Dy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:22:01 -0700

32 lines

Re: PTF Technology

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:49:33 EDT

85 lines

New Thread

Roll-to-Roll Research

Roll-to-Roll Research

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:16:51 -0500

31 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:05:24 -0400

60 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:08:09 -0500

87 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:22:32 -0500

130 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:37:02 EDT

69 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:56:58 -0400

310 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:13:32 -0400

385 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:52:46 EDT

41 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:18:08 -0500

394 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:24:03 -0500

112 lines

Re: Roll-to-Roll Research

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:41:36 -0400

137 lines

New Thread

Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA

Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA

Peter L <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:00:12 -0500

38 lines

Re: Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:06:40 -0400

75 lines

Re: Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:47:26 +0800

110 lines

Re: Second time reflow of PoP on bottom side of PCBA

Dean Stadem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:29:03 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Solder Ball Problem

Solder Ball Problem

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:15:43 -0700

69 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:35:02 -0500

125 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:42:54 -0500

94 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:58:13 -0700

109 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:22:08 -0300

111 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

Bob Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:47:25 -0700

158 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:10:44 -0700

118 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:26:25 +0100

112 lines

Re: Solder Ball Problem

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:26:49 +0200

188 lines

New Thread

solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal envi ronment

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal envi ronment

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:56:41 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:11:14 -0400

62 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:44:16 -0400

112 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:51:45 -0400

302 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:50:07 -0400

516 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:12:59 -0400

592 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:32:43 -0400

415 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:10:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:16:28 -0400

69 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:50:47 -0700

103 lines

Re: solder fatigue analysis for slowly changing thermal environment

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:06:23 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:42:35 -0800

30 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:48:04 -0400

61 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:59:57 -0300

61 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:00:57 -0500

95 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:03:05 -0500

105 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:12:26 -0500

136 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:15:27 -0500

146 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:26:15 -0800

171 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

李义 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:23:57 +0800

160 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:36:33 +0100

228 lines

Re: Solder Paste In the Solder Pot

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:36:48 +0000

101 lines

New Thread

Solderability fluxes

Re: Solderability fluxes

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:18:36 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:08:54 -0500

45 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:29:09 -0500

74 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:37:14 -0700

103 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Simonik, Dave R. (David) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:38:37 -0400

145 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:38:59 +0100

118 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:56:43 -0500

136 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 07:20:16 -0700

76 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:20:59 +0300

65 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:41:31 +0100

81 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:07:25 -0700

93 lines

Re: Solvent for cured cyanoacrylate adhesive

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:27:55 -0500

144 lines

New Thread

STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:08:15 -0400

37 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:15:06 -0700

64 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:24:33 -0500

67 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:28:15 +0100

96 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:51:21 +0100

132 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:31:08 -0500

116 lines

Re: STATIC DISSIPATIVE COATINGS

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:07:38 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Stencil Life

Stencil Life

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:08:46 -0400

53 lines

Re: Stencil Life

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:50:08 -0500

88 lines

Re: Stencil Life

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:00:50 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Straddle mount connector at SMT

Straddle mount connector at SMT

Peter L <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:54:52 -0500

44 lines

Re: Straddle mount connector at SMT

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:16:05 -0400

73 lines

Re: Straddle mount connector at SMT

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:51:37 -0500

81 lines

Re: Straddle mount connector at SMT

Peter L <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:30:11 -0500

28 lines

Re: Straddle mount connector at SMT

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:57:02 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

Test

Test

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:13:03 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

TH lead forming machines

TH lead forming machines

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:48:09 -0400

71 lines

Re: TH lead forming machines

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:17:09 -0500

122 lines

Re: TH lead forming machines

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:30:40 -0400

157 lines

Re: TH lead forming machines

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:39:27 -0500

161 lines

Re: TH lead forming machines

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:51:19 -0500

159 lines

Re: TH lead forming machines

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:28:53 +0000

213 lines

New Thread

The effects of vibration on SMT part overhang

The effects of vibration on SMT part overhang

Cindy S. Bohler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:10:34 -0500

29 lines

Re: The effects of vibration on SMT part overhang

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:26:49 -0400

72 lines

Re: The effects of vibration on SMT part overhang

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:49:56 +0000

57 lines

New Thread

threaded fastener selection guide

threaded fastener selection guide

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:43:51 -0700

46 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:59:04 -0400

89 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:09:17 -0400

75 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:44:46 -0400

103 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:58:25 -0800

124 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:02:56 -0400

167 lines

Re: threaded fastener selection guide

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:07:11 -0400

194 lines

New Thread

Traces and vias under components

Re: Traces and vias under components

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:22:41 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

when do vias require a thermal relief

when do vias require a thermal relief

Dee Stover <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:58:40 -0700

34 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:13:43 -0400

102 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:24:48 -0400

80 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:42:05 -0500

51 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:56:13 -0400

89 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:25:16 -0500

95 lines

Re: when do vias require a thermal relief

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:05:29 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:05:23 -0400

76 lines

Re: Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:16:52 -0400

101 lines

Re: Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:36:38 -0700

140 lines

Re: Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:39:48 -0400

168 lines

Re: Wire Crimps: Machine Vs Hand Tool Specs

Liu, Edwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:37:36 +0800

120 lines

New Thread

Zinc Plating and whiskers

Re: Zinc Plating and whiskers

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:53:54 -0400

77 lines

Re: Zinc Plating and whiskers

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:09:28 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

[DC] when do vias require a thermal relief

Re: [DC] when do vias require a thermal relief

Dee Stover <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:16:52 -0700

99 lines

Re: [DC] when do vias require a thermal relief

Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:27:01 -0500

44 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager